Relates to the liability of landowners who permit recreational uses of their land; establishes landowners owe no duty to keep premises safe for entry, passage over premises or other recreational uses or to give warning of any hazardous condition or use of or structure or activity on such premises to persons entering for such purposes.
Summary
Bill S06666 amends the general obligations law in New York concerning the liability of landowners who allow recreational activities on their property. It states that landowners, lessees, or occupants of premises are not required to keep their land safe for various recreational uses, such as hunting, fishing, hiking, and other outdoor activities. Furthermore, the bill specifies that landowners do not have to warn individuals about any hazardous conditions present on their property when they enter for recreational purposes.
Impact
The passage of this bill would significantly alter the legal landscape regarding landowner liability in New York. By limiting the responsibilities of landowners for injuries that occur during recreational activities, it could encourage more landowners to permit public access to their land for such uses. This change may also affect existing statutes related to premises liability and could lead to an increase in recreational activities on private lands, potentially benefiting local economies and communities.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding Bill S06666 appears to be mixed based on the discussions and voting history. Proponents argue that it encourages landowners to open their properties for recreational use without the fear of litigation, while opponents express concern that it may lead to increased injuries and lack of accountability for landowners. The absence of recorded votes suggests that the bill may still be under consideration or that there has been limited engagement from lawmakers.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the balance between promoting recreational access and ensuring safety for individuals using private lands. Advocates for the bill, primarily from outdoor recreation groups, argue that it will enhance public access to nature and encourage land stewardship. In contrast, some lawmakers and safety advocates are concerned that the bill could lead to more injuries without adequate warnings or safety measures in place, potentially placing vulnerable populations at risk.
Relates to the liability of landowners who permit recreational uses of their land; establishes landowners owe no duty to keep premises safe for entry, passage over premises or other recreational uses or to give warning of any hazardous condition or use of or structure or activity on such premises to persons entering for such purposes.
Provides that the owner, lessee or occupant of premises owes no duty to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others engaged generally in recreational activities.
Amending the act of February 2, 1966 (1965 P.L.1860, No.586), entitled "An act encouraging landowners to make land and water areas available to the public for recreational purposes by limiting liability in connection therewith, and repealing certain acts," further providing for definitions, for duty to keep premises safe and warning and for assurance of safe premises and duty of care and responsibility and liability.
Removes liability for the death of a person caused by any act of persons permitted to use certain premises; removes liability from the owner, lessee or occupant of premises adjacent to such premises.