Suspends all unnecessary travel to states that have enacted a law that voids or repeals, or has the effect of voiding or repealing, existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression or have enacted a law that authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, including any law that creates an exemption to antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
Summary
Bill S06636 seeks to amend the executive law in New York to suspend all unnecessary state-funded or state-sponsored travel to states that have enacted laws permitting discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. The bill specifically targets states that have voided existing protections against such discrimination or have enacted laws that allow discrimination against same-sex couples and their families. The suspension of travel would apply unless the travel is necessary for enforcing New York state law, fulfilling prior contractual obligations, or protecting public health and safety.
Impact
If enacted, this bill would create a significant impact on state travel policies, effectively barring state agencies from traveling to certain states that do not uphold New York's anti-discrimination standards. This could lead to reduced state engagement and collaboration with those states, potentially affecting various state functions and operations that require inter-state cooperation. The attorney general would be responsible for maintaining a list of states subject to this travel suspension, ensuring compliance with the new law.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding Bill S06636 appears to be supportive among its sponsors and advocates who emphasize the importance of protecting LGBTQ+ rights and ensuring that state resources are not used in ways that contradict New York's values. However, there may be opposition from those who argue that such measures could hinder necessary state functions and limit collaboration with other states.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the potential implications for state operations and inter-state relations, with some arguing that the bill could limit essential travel for state business. Opponents may also raise concerns about the practicality of enforcing such a travel ban and the potential for unintended consequences on state contracts and public services that require travel to affected states.
Suspends all unnecessary travel to states that have enacted a law that voids or repeals, or has the effect of voiding or repealing, existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression or have enacted a law that authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, including any law that creates an exemption to antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.