New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Senate Bill S05658

Introduced
2/26/25  
Refer
2/26/25  

Caption

Establishes the crime of aggravated obstructing emergency medical services for conduct which obstructs the efforts of certain emergency services, personnel or systems while obstructing traffic or posing a risk of serious physical injury; permits forfeiture.

Summary

S05658 would create a new crime in the Penal Law called “aggravated obstructing emergency medical services.” A person would commit this offense by intentionally and unreasonably obstructing the work of emergency medical services personnel, technicians, systems, or units covered by Public Health Law section 3001, and either blocking vehicular traffic or engaging in conduct that creates a risk of serious physical injury to others. The new offense would be classified as a class E felony. The bill also amends the Vehicle and Traffic Law to add this new felony to the existing vehicle seizure and forfeiture provisions. Under the bill, a motor vehicle used in the commission of aggravated obstructing emergency medical services could be seized and, under certain circumstances, forfeited or deemed abandoned if not reclaimed within the applicable time period. The measure also updates related forfeiture procedures for owners and lienholders, including notice, intervention, and proof requirements.

Impact

The bill would expand New York’s criminal law by adding a felony offense specifically targeting interference with emergency medical services operations when the conduct is especially dangerous or traffic-related. It would also broaden the list of offenses that can trigger vehicle seizure and forfeiture under the Vehicle and Traffic Law, creating potential property consequences for vehicles used in the offense. Affected parties would include individuals accused of obstructing EMS, vehicle owners, and security-interest holders who may need to assert claims in forfeiture proceedings.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and the limited available context, the measure appears to be framed as a public-safety and emergency-response protection bill, with no recorded committee debate or votes showing opposition or support. The sponsor list and caption suggest an intent to deter dangerous interference with emergency medical responders. Because there are no transcripts or voting records provided, the overall sentiment cannot be measured directly, but the bill’s structure indicates a law-and-order approach aimed at protecting EMS operations.

Contention

The main potential points of contention are the breadth of the new felony and the use of vehicle forfeiture as a penalty. Critics could question whether the terms “intentionally and unreasonably obstructs” or “poses a risk of serious physical injury” are sufficiently precise, and whether felony treatment is proportionate in cases involving protest activity, crowd control incidents, or other forms of obstruction. Vehicle owners and lienholders may also be concerned about forfeiture consequences when a vehicle is used in the offense, especially where ownership and knowledge issues are disputed.

Companion Bills

NY A05839

Same As Establishes the crime of aggravated obstructing emergency medical services for conduct which obstructs the efforts of certain emergency services, personnel or systems while obstructing traffic or posing a risk of serious physical injury; permits forfeiture.

Previously Filed As

NY A05839

Establishes the crime of aggravated obstructing emergency medical services for conduct which obstructs the efforts of certain emergency services, personnel or systems while obstructing traffic or posing a risk of serious physical injury; permits forfeiture.

AL HB411

Civil practice; affirmative defenses; limitation of liability for damages sustained for obstructing traffic for the obstruction of vehicle traffic, established

AL HB509

Civil practice; affirmative defenses; limitation of liability for damages sustained for obstructing traffic for the obstruction of vehicle traffic, established

WV SB74

Establishing criminal offense of obstructing highway or other passageway

TX HB4207

Relating to obstructing a railroad crossing and the liability of a railway company for such an obstruction; providing a civil penalty.

MN HF329

Penalties for obstructing trunk highway, airport, or transit traffic increased.

MN SF728

Penalties increase for obstructing trunk highway, airport, or transit traffic

AL HB509

Civil practice; affirmative defenses; limitation of liability for damages sustained for obstructing traffic for the obstruction of vehicle traffic, established

WV SB55

Establishing criminal offense for obstructing or hindering home incarceration supervisor or social services worker

AK HB71

Obstruction Of Certain Public Places

Similar Bills

CA AB2570

Elderly Parole Program.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.

TX HB1080

Relating to the publication of required notice by a political subdivision by alternative media.

CA SB680

Sex offender registration: unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.

CA AB387

An act to amend Section 219 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to juries.

CA SB689

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

US HB31

Cover Outstanding Vulnerable Expansion-eligible Residents Now Act or the COVER Now Act This bill establishes a demonstration program to allow local governments to provide health benefits to the Medicaid expansion population in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Under the program, local governments may provide coverage for individuals who are newly eligible for Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (i.e., the Medicaid expansion population) for a maximum of 10 years, or until their respective states expand Medicaid. The bill provides a 100% federal matching rate for the first three years of program participation. The bill prohibits states from taking certain actions against participating localities, such as withholding funding, increasing taxes, or restricting provider participation. States that violate these requirements are subject to certain funding penalties.