New York Senate Bill S04954

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/25
• Refer: 2/14/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Prohibits the use of lead ammunition in the taking of wildlife on wildlife management areas, state forests, forest preserves, state parks or any other state-owned land that is open for hunting and on land contributing surface water to the New York city water supply.

Summary

Bill S04954 aims to amend the environmental conservation law in New York by prohibiting the use of lead ammunition for hunting wildlife on state-owned lands, including wildlife management areas, state forests, forest preserves, and state parks. Additionally, it restricts the use of lead ammunition on lands that contribute surface water to the New York City water supply. The bill defines lead ammunition as any ammunition containing one percent or more lead by weight, thereby targeting the environmental and health risks associated with lead exposure in wildlife and water sources.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly alter hunting practices in New York by mandating the use of non-lead ammunition in designated areas. This change is expected to enhance wildlife conservation efforts and protect water quality, particularly in regions supplying drinking water to millions of residents in New York City. The bill may also necessitate updates to hunting regulations and educational materials provided to hunters regarding permissible ammunition types.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill S04954 appears to be cautiously supportive among environmental advocates who emphasize the need for safer hunting practices and the protection of wildlife and water resources. However, there may be some opposition from hunting groups concerned about the availability and cost of non-lead ammunition, as well as potential restrictions on hunting activities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential economic impact on hunters and the availability of non-lead ammunition. Some hunting organizations may argue that the transition to non-lead ammunition could impose financial burdens on hunters, while environmental advocates counter that the long-term benefits to wildlife and public health justify these changes. The discussion may also touch on the effectiveness of non-lead alternatives compared to traditional lead ammunition.