Aligns state and local procurement laws with federal law prohibiting the procurement of certain information and communications technology and electronic parts or products which are determined to pose a risk to state and national security.
Summary
Bill S03259 aims to amend the state finance law and general municipal law to prohibit the procurement of certain information and communications technology that poses security threats. Specifically, it aligns state and local procurement laws with federal regulations under section 889 of Public Law 115-232 of 2018, which restricts the purchase of technology deemed a risk to national security. The bill mandates the creation of a list of restricted technologies by the chief information officer, in consultation with relevant state and federal agencies, and outlines the conditions under which waivers from these restrictions may be granted.
Impact
The passage of this bill will significantly impact state procurement processes by ensuring that state and local agencies do not enter into contracts for technology that could compromise security. It establishes a framework for evaluating and restricting technology procurement based on federal guidelines, thereby enhancing the security posture of New York State's information and communications infrastructure. The bill also provides clarity on existing technologies, ensuring that current systems are not disrupted while implementing these new restrictions.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding Bill S03259 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as evidenced by the voting history. The bill received strong support in both the Senate and Assembly, with unanimous votes in favor during the final passage stages. This suggests a collective agreement among lawmakers on the importance of securing state technology procurement against potential threats.
Contention
While there is broad support for the bill, some points of contention may arise regarding the implementation of the waiver process. Concerns could be raised about how waivers are granted and the criteria used to determine whether a technology poses a security risk. Additionally, there may be discussions about the potential impact on procurement timelines and costs, particularly if compliant products are not readily available.
Same As
Aligns state and local procurement laws with federal law prohibiting the procurement of certain information and communications technology and electronic parts or products which are determined to pose a risk to state and national security.
Aligns state and local procurement laws with federal law prohibiting the procurement of certain technology and electronic parts or products which are determined to pose a risk to state and national security; relates to the authority of the office of information technology services to issue certain guidance relating thereto.
Aligns state and local procurement laws with federal law prohibiting the procurement of certain technology and electronic parts or products which are determined to pose a risk to state and national security; relates to the authority of the office of information technology services to issue certain guidance relating thereto.
Aligns state and local procurement laws with federal law prohibiting the procurement of certain information and communications technology and electronic parts or products which are determined to pose a risk to state and national security.
House Substitute for SB 51 by Committee on Legislative Modernization - Authorizing the chief information security officer to receive audit reports, updating statutes related to services provided by the chief information technology officer and authorizing the office of information technology services to provide certain services to political subdivisions and hospitals.