New York Senate Bill S02728

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/25
• Refer: 1/22/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Provides that employees of the state police shall not be directed by executive order or regulations to not assist with the enforcement of federal laws.

Summary

S02728 would add a new section to the New York Executive Law prohibiting state regulations, rules, or executive orders from directing the State Police not to assist in enforcing federal law or not to cooperate with federal law enforcement. The bill applies to the superintendent and all state police personnel, and it declares any such contrary directive invalid, null, and void. It takes effect immediately if enacted. In practical terms, the bill is designed to ensure that the State Police remain available to support federal law enforcement efforts rather than being restricted by state-level policy choices. It does not itself create new enforcement powers or duties under federal law; instead, it limits the state’s ability to issue noncooperation directives that would prevent state police participation in federal enforcement activities.

Impact

The bill would amend the Executive Law by adding a new section 236, creating a statutory prohibition on state-level directives that bar State Police cooperation with federal law enforcement. If enacted, it would constrain the governor’s executive authority and any agency regulations to the extent they attempt to limit such cooperation, and it would render conflicting directives void. The affected parties are the New York State Police, the superintendent, and other state police officers, as well as state policymakers who might otherwise issue noncooperation orders.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and available context, the measure appears to reflect a pro-cooperation, pro-law-enforcement stance and is framed as a safeguard against state restrictions on federal enforcement support. There are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, so no formal legislative debate or vote-based sentiment can be assessed. The bill’s language suggests support from sponsors favoring closer state-federal law enforcement coordination, while likely drawing concern from those who favor executive discretion or policies limiting cooperation with federal authorities.

Contention

The main point of contention is whether the state should be able to direct its police not to assist federal enforcement efforts, which this bill would prohibit. Supporters would likely argue that cooperation with federal law enforcement is necessary for public safety and consistent enforcement of federal law. Opponents may argue that the bill limits state sovereignty, constrains the governor’s ability to set enforcement priorities, and could undermine policies intended to distance state police from certain federal actions. No specific individuals or groups are identified in the provided materials beyond the sponsor, Sen. Ortt.