New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Senate Bill S02165

Introduced
1/15/25  
Refer
1/15/25  

Caption

Prohibits hospital interference with patient care where the practitioner is acting in good faith and within the scope of their practice; defines emergency medical conditions; requires appropriate medical screening and stabilizing treatment of persons in an emergency department, including pregnant persons, or appropriate transfer.

Summary

Bill S02165 aims to amend the public health law in New York to prohibit hospitals from interfering with patient care when healthcare practitioners act in good faith and within their professional scope. It defines what constitutes an emergency medical condition, particularly in relation to pregnant individuals, and mandates that hospitals provide appropriate medical screening and stabilizing treatment for patients in emergency situations. The bill also establishes protocols for the transfer of patients when necessary, ensuring that such transfers do not compromise patient care.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will significantly impact how hospitals operate in emergency situations, reinforcing the obligation to treat patients without delay based on their ability to pay or insurance status. It will also enhance protections for healthcare practitioners against retaliation for providing necessary care, thereby potentially improving patient outcomes in emergency medical situations. The repeal of certain provisions related to fetal demise protocols may also alter how hospitals handle such cases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill S02165 appears to be generally supportive among its sponsors and advocates, emphasizing the importance of patient care and the need for clear guidelines in emergency medical situations. However, there may be concerns from some hospital administrators regarding the implications of the bill on hospital operations and liability, particularly in relation to the definitions of emergency medical conditions and the requirements for patient transfers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased liability for hospitals and healthcare practitioners if they fail to meet the standards set forth in the bill. Some stakeholders may argue that the bill could lead to unintended consequences, such as overburdening emergency departments or complicating the transfer process for patients. Additionally, the repeal of certain fetal demise protocols may raise ethical concerns among some healthcare providers.

Companion Bills

NY A01165

Same As Prohibits hospital interference with patient care where the practitioner is acting in good faith and within the scope of their practice; defines emergency medical conditions; requires appropriate medical screening and stabilizing treatment of persons in an emergency department, including pregnant persons, or appropriate transfer.

Similar Bills

NJ S1461

Modifies collective Statewide transfer agreement and reverse transfer agreement; establishes New Jersey Transfer Ombudsperson within Office of Secretary of Higher Education.

NJ A1315

Modifies collective statewide transfer agreement and reverse transfer agreement; establishes New Jersey Transfer Ombudsperson within Office of Secretary of Higher Education.

TX SB1559

Relating to conflicts between a protective order and certain other orders and to the transfer of a protective order.

DE HB147

An Act To Amend Title 12, Title 18, Title 25, And Title 30 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Uniform Real Property Transfer On Death Act.

NV AB62

Revises provisions relating to transferable tax credits for affordable housing. (BDR 32-437)

VA HB1871

Transfer on death deeds; inter vivos deed conveying real property to another.

MS SB2344

Youth court; revise transfer to circuit court.

MS SB2226

Youth court; revise transfer to circuit court.