New York Senate Bill S01910

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/25
• Refer: 1/14/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Requires the filing of additional transferor and contributor identification information in campaign receipt and expenditure statements for the receipt of amounts over one hundred dollars, including the full name, full residential address including any suite, floor, or apartment, occupation, employer and employer's full business address in the case of an individual, and the full name and address of any partnership, committee, association, corporation, labor organization or group of persons.

Summary

Bill S01910 amends the election law in New York to require political committees to provide additional identification information for contributors and transferors in campaign finance statements. Specifically, it mandates that if contributions or transfers exceed ninety-nine dollars, detailed identification must be included, such as full name, residential address, occupation, and employer information for individuals, as well as the full name and business address for organizations. This change aims to enhance transparency in campaign financing by ensuring that significant contributions are properly documented and attributed.

Impact

The bill impacts state election laws by tightening the requirements for campaign finance disclosures. It introduces stricter identification protocols for contributions over a specified threshold, which could lead to greater accountability and transparency in political funding. This change may affect how political committees manage their contributions and could potentially deter anonymous or undisclosed funding sources.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around Bill S01910 appears to be supportive among advocates for campaign finance reform, who argue that increased transparency is necessary to combat corruption and ensure fair elections. However, there may be concerns from political committees about the administrative burden and privacy implications of disclosing detailed personal information of contributors.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between transparency and privacy. Supporters argue that the detailed identification requirements are essential for accountability, while opponents may raise concerns about the potential chilling effect on small donors who might be reluctant to contribute if their personal information is publicly disclosed. Additionally, there may be discussions regarding the practicality of implementing these new requirements for smaller political committees.