Requires leases, licenses and management agreements entered into by the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation relating to the use or management of state parks and historic sites, having a term of more than 1 year, to comply with the recommendations of the management or master plan of the state park or historic site to which the lease, license or management plan relates.
Summary
Bill S01383 amends the parks, recreation and historic preservation law by requiring that all leases, licenses, and management agreements related to state parks and historic sites comply with the recommendations outlined in the respective park's or site's master plan. This requirement applies specifically to agreements with a term longer than one year. If a state park or historic site does not have an existing management or master plan, then no agreement can exceed a one-year term. The bill aims to ensure that the management of state parks aligns with established plans for their use and preservation.
Impact
The bill will impact how state parks and historic sites are managed by enforcing compliance with master plans, thereby promoting consistency in management practices. It will also limit the duration of agreements in the absence of a master plan, potentially affecting the operations of various stakeholders involved in park management. This could lead to more strategic planning and resource allocation in state parks, as all long-term agreements will need to reflect the goals and recommendations of the master plans.
Sentiment
The sentiment around Bill S01383 appears to be generally supportive among stakeholders who prioritize the preservation and proper management of state parks and historic sites. However, there may be concerns from entities that rely on longer-term agreements for the management of these sites, as the bill imposes restrictions that could affect their operations and planning.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise from stakeholders who favor more flexible management agreements without the constraints of adhering strictly to master plans. Some may argue that the requirement could hinder the ability of parks to adapt to changing circumstances or needs. Conversely, proponents of the bill argue that adherence to master plans is essential for the sustainable management of state resources.
Same As
Requires leases, licenses and management agreements entered into by the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation relating to the use or management of state parks and historic sites, having a term of more than 1 year, to comply with the recommendations of the management or master plan of the state park or historic site to which the lease, license or management plan relates.
Requires leases, licenses and management agreements entered into by the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation relating to the use or management of state parks and historic sites, having a term of more than 1 year, to comply with the recommendations of the management or master plan of the state park or historic site to which the lease, license or management plan relates.
Requires leases, licenses and management agreements entered into by the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation relating to the use or management of state parks and historic sites, having a term of more than 1 year, to comply with the recommendations of the management or master plan of the state park or historic site to which the lease, license or management plan relates.
Requires the commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation to acquire the mineral interests under all land acquired or received by the state for the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation, unless the commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation finds that the land is of great significance and importance to the state.
Requires the commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation to acquire the mineral interests under all land acquired or received by the state for the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation, unless the commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation finds that the land is of great significance and importance to the state.