New York Assembly Bill K00592

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/27/25
• Passed: 5/27/25

Caption

Commemorating the 30th Annual Mohawk Valley Ride for Missing Children on June 6, 2025

Summary

Assembly Resolution No. 592 is a ceremonial resolution commemorating the 30th Annual Mohawk Valley Ride for Missing Children, scheduled for June 6, 2025. The resolution recognizes the event’s history, its connection to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), and the role the ride has played in raising awareness and funds to support efforts related to missing and exploited children. The measure highlights the ride’s community role, including its support for poster distribution, search campaigns, and emotional support for families affected by child abduction and exploitation. It also praises the volunteers and participants who have sustained the event and asks that an engrossed copy of the resolution be transmitted to the organization as a formal tribute.

Impact

This resolution does not amend state law, create new programs, or appropriate funds. Its legal effect is limited to official legislative recognition and commemoration of the Mohawk Valley Ride for Missing Children and the broader mission of NCMEC. The primary parties affected are the event organizers, volunteers, families of missing children, and the nonprofit advocacy network associated with child safety and recovery efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the resolution is strongly supportive and laudatory. The text frames the ride and its volunteers as noble, community-minded, and effective in advancing child safety and awareness. Because there is no recorded committee debate or vote history in the provided materials, the available context suggests unanimous or noncontroversial ceremonial support rather than substantive disagreement.

Contention

No notable points of contention appear in the provided record. The resolution is purely commemorative and does not raise policy disputes, fiscal concerns, or statutory changes. Any discussion would likely center on the value of public recognition for child-safety advocacy and the role of community fundraising, but no opposing views are documented.