Honoring the Lexington School for the Deaf upon the occasion of hosting its 28th Annual Basketball Classic vs. Assembly/Senate All-Stars on May 20, 2025
Summary
This resolution honors the Lexington School for the Deaf on the occasion of its 28th Annual Basketball Classic against the Assembly and Senate All-Stars, scheduled for May 20, 2025. It recounts the school’s history, from its founding in 1864 to its current status as the largest school for the deaf in New York State, serving more than 250 students from infancy through high school and drawing students from across New York City and nearby counties.
The resolution also highlights the school’s role as a charter member of the 4201 Association, its unique place as the only high school in New York City under that charter, and its broader academic, athletic, and cultural programming. It recognizes the longstanding tradition of the Legislature’s basketball game with the school, originally established in 1995, and formally commends the school’s leadership, staff, and coaches for their service to deaf children and their families.
Impact
This is a ceremonial resolution and does not change state law, create new programs, or amend any statutes. Its practical effect is to formally recognize and commend the Lexington School for the Deaf and to direct that copies of the resolution be transmitted to named school officials, reinforcing legislative support for deaf education and for New York’s 4201 private schools for students with disabilities.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is strongly positive and celebratory. The language is appreciative of the school’s long history, educational mission, and athletic traditions, and there is no indication of opposition or controversy in the available record. The measure appears to have been offered as a customary act of recognition and goodwill toward the school and its community.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in the text or available legislative history, since the resolution is honorary rather than substantive. The only potentially relevant point of distinction is the emphasis on the school’s status within the 4201 Association and its role as a state-supported private school for disabled children, but this is presented as background and not as a disputed issue. No votes or committee debates are available to suggest disagreement.