Memorializing Governor Kathy Hochul to proclaim April 2025, as Bullying Prevention Month in the State of New York
Summary
This resolution memorializes Governor Kathy Hochul to proclaim April 2025 as Bullying Prevention Month in New York State, in conjunction with National Bullying Prevention Month. It is a commemorative measure intended to raise public awareness about bullying, describe its forms and harms, and encourage kindness and prevention efforts across the state.
The resolution includes findings about the nature of bullying, noting that it can be direct or indirect, and that it may be based on race, age, religion, disability, appearance, socioeconomic status, and other factors. It also cites statistics and broader social consequences, including school absenteeism, academic problems, substance abuse, violence, and the effects on bystanders who witness bullying.
Impact
As a memorializing resolution, this measure does not amend the Education Law, Penal Law, or any other state statute, and it does not create new legal duties, funding, or enforcement mechanisms. Its practical effect is symbolic and promotional: it asks the Governor to issue a proclamation and transmits the resolution to the Governor, thereby supporting statewide awareness efforts around bullying prevention and school climate.
Sentiment
The tone of the resolution is strongly supportive and preventive, emphasizing compassion, awareness, and the importance of addressing bullying as a serious public issue. Because no committee transcript or vote record is provided, there is no evidence of recorded opposition or debate in the available materials. The bill text itself reflects a consensus-style commemorative resolution rather than a contested policy proposal.
Contention
No specific points of contention are identified in the available record. The resolution is nonbinding and ceremonial, so any disagreement would likely be limited to the general value of proclamations versus more substantive anti-bullying policy measures, but no such criticism appears in the provided context. The measure’s focus on awareness rather than regulatory change suggests little inherent legislative conflict.