Mourning the death of Robin Savino, beloved sister, devoted companion, and esteemed member of her community
Summary
This resolution is a formal memorial tribute by the New York State Senate mourning the death of Robin Savino of Staten Island, who passed away at age 63. It recounts her life story, including her upbringing in Queens, education at Most Precious Blood R.C. School, Dominican Commercial High School, and Queensborough Community College, and her career as a legal secretary at Shearman & Sterling, where she advanced through merit and was recognized for her professionalism.
The resolution also highlights her personal life, including her long relationship with Edward Tunstall, a retired New York City Fire Department firefighter, and their life together in Queens and Staten Island. It emphasizes her warmth, generosity, devotion to family and friends, and the lasting legacy she leaves behind. The measure directs that copies of the resolution be transmitted to her family members, including former Senator Diane J. Savino.
Impact
This resolution does not change state law, create new programs, or amend any statutes. Its legal effect is ceremonial only: it places the Senate’s official condolences and recognition into the legislative record and authorizes transmission of the engrossed resolution to the named family members. The affected parties are primarily the Savino family and the broader community being honored through the memorial tribute.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly respectful, solemn, and supportive. As a mourning resolution, it reflects the Senate’s customary practice of honoring New Yorkers whose lives and service enriched their communities. There is no recorded opposition, vote controversy, or committee debate in the provided materials, and the tone is one of shared sympathy and recognition of Robin Savino’s life and character.
Contention
There are no notable points of contention in the available record. The resolution is commemorative rather than policy-driven, and the provided context includes no committee transcripts, amendments, or votes indicating disagreement. Any discussion would likely have centered only on the appropriateness of the tribute and the details of the honoree’s life, not on substantive legislative issues.