New York Senate Bill J01090

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/23/25
• Refer: 5/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Passed: 5/28/25

Caption

Honoring Investigator Matt Gacek upon the occasion of his retirement after 20 years of dedicated service to the field of law enforcement

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 1090 is a ceremonial resolution honoring Investigator Matt Gacek upon his retirement after 20 years of service in law enforcement. The resolution recounts his career beginning in 2004 with the Village of Boonville, followed by service with the Vernon and Sherrill Police Departments, and then the Oneida Police Department beginning in 2006. It also notes his recognition as Officer of the Year in 2018 and his service on community boards, including BRiDGES and the Madison County Community Services Board. The resolution does not change substantive law or create new policy. Instead, it serves as a formal legislative commendation, entered into the record to recognize an individual public servant’s career and contributions to public safety and community service. A copy of the resolution is to be transmitted to Investigator Gacek as an official tribute.

Impact

This resolution has no direct impact on state statutes, regulations, appropriations, or agency authority. Its effect is purely ceremonial: it formally recognizes Investigator Matt Gacek’s retirement and his contributions to law enforcement and community service, while adding the Legislature’s commendation to the official record.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the resolution is strongly positive and appreciative. The text emphasizes gratitude, admiration, and respect for Gacek’s long service, professionalism, and community involvement. Because this is a noncontroversial honorary resolution, there is no evidence of opposition or divided views in the available record.

Contention

There are no notable points of contention in the bill text, and no committee transcripts or votes are available indicating disagreement. The resolution is a routine recognition measure, so any discussion would likely center only on the appropriateness of honoring Gacek’s career and service, rather than on policy differences or legal effects.