New York Assembly Bill A10749

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/26
• Refer: 3/27/26

Caption

Relates to licensing restrictions for on-premises alcohol consumption for manufacturers and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages at specific locations

Summary

A10749 amends the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law to create a location-specific exception to New York’s licensing restrictions for manufacturers and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages that also sell at retail. Although the bill text is drafted as a detailed metes-and-bounds description, the practical effect is to identify specific parcels in Ontario County—centered in the Town of Gorham and the City of Canandaigua—where the licensing restriction would be modified. The bill is framed as a narrow, site-specific change rather than a broad statewide policy shift. The measure appears intended to allow or facilitate on-premises alcohol consumption or related licensing activity at the identified properties by carving those locations into the statutory licensing framework. Because it amends the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, it would affect how the State Liquor Authority applies manufacturer/wholesaler retail-sale restrictions to the named parcels and any businesses operating there. The bill takes effect immediately upon enactment. The available context shows little recorded debate, no committee transcript, and no voting history in the materials provided, so there is no documented opposition or support to gauge from floor or committee discussion. The bill’s narrow geographic scope suggests it is likely a local or project-specific licensing measure, which often draws limited public controversy compared with broader alcohol policy changes. Based on the bill’s purpose and structure, the main point of contention would likely be whether a special exemption for a few parcels is appropriate under the state’s alcohol licensing rules, especially if it is seen as granting preferential treatment to particular businesses or developments. Supporters would likely view it as a targeted economic development or hospitality-related accommodation, while critics might question the precedent of tailoring alcohol licensing law to individual properties.

Impact

This bill would amend section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law by adding a new location-specific subparagraph that identifies three parcels in Ontario County. Its legal effect is to alter the licensing restrictions that otherwise limit manufacturers and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages from selling at retail or engaging in on-premises consumption at those sites. The change would apply only to the described parcels in the Town of Gorham and the City of Canandaigua, leaving the broader statewide licensing scheme intact.

Sentiment

The bill’s sentiment appears neutral to mildly supportive based on the absence of recorded opposition, committee testimony, or vote data in the provided materials. Its highly specific, local nature suggests it is likely a targeted accommodation for a particular business or development rather than a controversial statewide alcohol policy change. Because no discussion transcripts or votes are included, there is no evidence of significant public debate in the record supplied.

Contention

The likely contention is the use of a special statutory carve-out for named parcels, which may be viewed as a one-off exception to general alcohol licensing restrictions. Potential supporters would be local economic development interests, property owners, or hospitality operators seeking flexibility for on-premises alcohol service. Potential critics would be those concerned about fairness, precedent, or the legislature using the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law to benefit specific locations rather than applying uniform rules.