New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A10658

Introduced
3/19/26  

Caption

Establishes standards for the design and construction of all-gender bathrooms

Summary

This bill establishes statewide design and construction standards for all-gender bathrooms in New York, amending the executive law and New York City’s administrative plumbing code. It defines all-gender bathrooms as multi-fixture toilet rooms with separate, lockable partitions and a shared sink area, and it directs the relevant department to adopt or amend regulations to permit and facilitate their use in a broad range of facilities, including commercial, institutional, educational, and public buildings. The bill sets specific privacy and security requirements for these restrooms, including lockable stalls with minimum door height and limited undercut, no visual gaps at doors or pilasters, shared sinks outside stalls, optional sinks within stalls, and privacy partitions meeting recognized IAPMO standards. It also allows urinals if they are enclosed in individual lockable stalls meeting the same privacy standards, and requires signage and wayfinding rules that clearly identify all-gender bathrooms while preserving inclusivity and accessibility. The bill applies to both new construction and existing buildings undergoing repair, renovation, or alteration, and it takes effect 90 days after enactment, with immediate authorization for necessary rulemaking. Its legal impact would be to create enforceable state-level standards for all-gender bathroom design and to require regulatory implementation for buildings covered by the state building code and the New York City plumbing code. The measure would affect architects, builders, building owners, code officials, and public and private facilities subject to construction or renovation requirements, while also shaping how restrooms are labeled, configured, and approved for use. The available context shows no recorded votes or committee transcript discussion, so there is no documented floor or committee sentiment beyond the bill’s introduction and referral to the Assembly Committee on Governmental Operations. Based on the text, the bill appears generally supportive of expanding access to all-gender restrooms while emphasizing privacy, security, and clear signage, suggesting an effort to balance inclusion with concerns about user comfort and safety. Potential points of contention are likely to center on whether the mandated design standards are too prescriptive or costly for builders and owners, and whether the requirements for stall dimensions, partitions, and signage are practical for all existing facilities. Supporters would likely emphasize accessibility, inclusivity, and uniform standards, while critics may focus on implementation burdens, code compliance, and the extent to which the state should regulate restroom design in both public and private buildings.

Impact

The bill would amend the executive law and the New York City plumbing code to establish statewide and city-specific standards for all-gender bathrooms, including design specifications, signage requirements, and permission for use in new construction and renovations. It would require the responsible department to promulgate or amend regulations, thereby affecting building code administration, construction practices, and compliance obligations for facilities across multiple use groups.

Sentiment

No committee transcript or vote history is available, so there is no formal recorded sentiment from debate or roll call. The bill’s text suggests a generally pro-access and pro-inclusion posture, with an emphasis on privacy and security standards that may be intended to broaden support by addressing common concerns about restroom design and user safety.

Contention

The main likely points of contention are the specificity and cost of the required design standards, including stall height, undercut limits, partition requirements, and signage rules. Supporters are likely to favor the bill as a way to normalize and standardize all-gender restrooms in public and private buildings, while opponents or skeptics may argue that the mandates are burdensome for existing structures, expensive to retrofit, or overly detailed for code regulation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.