Relates to the use of assumed and corporate names by companies in the business of household goods moving; provides that companies may not use the words "mover", "moving", or "relocation service" or any abbreviation or derivative thereof unless approved by the commissioner of transportation.
Summary
This bill would tighten New York’s rules on business names used by companies in the household goods moving industry. It amends the Business Corporation Law, Limited Liability Company Law, and Partnership Law to bar new entities from using the words “mover,” “moving,” or “relocation service,” or close derivatives, in their names unless they first obtain approval from the Commissioner of Transportation. The commissioner may deny approval if the proposed name is likely to mislead the public into thinking the business is authorized under the state’s household goods moving certification laws.
The bill also adds new provisions to the Transportation Law making it unlawful for any individual, partnership, company, or corporation to knowingly use, advertise, or transact business under those terms unless authorized to operate as a mover. Violations would be subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000, and businesses already using such names would have one year to come into compliance by obtaining the proper certificate. The measure takes effect 30 days after becoming law.
Impact
The bill would affect the formation and naming of corporations, LLCs, and limited partnerships in New York by adding transportation-commissioner approval requirements for names implying moving services. It also creates new Transportation Law sections 172-a and 191-a to prohibit unauthorized use of mover-related names in business advertising and operations, while preserving a transition period for existing businesses. The practical impact is to strengthen consumer protection and enforcement against misleading business names in the moving industry, and to tie name usage more closely to the state’s mover certification regime under Transportation Law sections 172 and 191.
Sentiment
The available voting history suggests strong bipartisan or at least broad committee support, with unanimous favorable votes in both the Assembly Corporations, Authorities and Commissions Committee and the Assembly Codes Committee. No committee transcript is available, but the bill’s framing indicates a consumer-protection rationale rather than a controversial policy shift. Overall sentiment appears positive and focused on preventing public confusion and deceptive business practices.
Contention
The main point of contention, as reflected in the bill text, is the restriction on business names that could imply mover authorization when none exists. Supporters are likely concerned with misleading advertising and unlicensed moving operations, while affected businesses may view the approval requirement and penalties as burdensome or limiting to branding. The bill also centralizes discretion in the Commissioner of Transportation, who can deny name approval based on the likelihood of public confusion, which could be a point of concern for businesses seeking flexibility in naming.
Same As
Relates to the use of assumed and corporate names by companies in the business of household goods moving; provides that companies may not use the words "mover", "moving", or "relocation service" or any abbreviation or derivative thereof unless approved by the commissioner of transportation.
Relates to the use of assumed and corporate names by companies in the business of household goods moving; provides that companies may not use the words "mover", "moving", or "relocation service" or any abbreviation or derivative thereof unless approved by the commissioner of transportation.
Requires insurance companies, medical expense indemnity corporations, hospital service corporations, health service corporations and medical assistance programs to provide coverage for prescribed antiviral therapeutics approved by the food and drug administration for the treatment of COVID-19 at no cost to the patient.
Enacts the "billing transparency act"; provides that every utility corporation, energy services corporation and municipality shall provide an itemized breakdown of customers' bills each month; provides that electric utility corporations, energy services companies and municipalities shall maintain a dedicated and easily accessible customer website that explains customer charges.
Requires legislative approval of any utility rate or charge increase approved by the public service commission; provides that the legislature can approve, modify or rescind any rate or charge increase approved by the commission by concurrent resolution; provides that the legislature can review any rate or charge increase approved in the prior 12 months.
Requires legislative approval of any utility rate or charge increase approved by the public service commission; provides that the legislature can approve, modify or rescind any rate or charge increase approved by the commission by concurrent resolution; provides that the legislature can review any rate or charge increase approved in the prior 12 months.
Enacts the "mandatory arbitration & business licensing act"; provides that no state agency or local government shall issue or renew a covered license to any person that refuses to certify that such person will not, as the owner or operator of a business or provider of services in the state or a local government operating pursuant to such license; makes related provisions.
Enacts the "mandatory arbitration & business licensing act"; provides that no state agency or local government shall issue or renew a covered license to any person that refuses to certify that such person will not, as the owner or operator of a business or provider of services in the state or a local government operating pursuant to such license; makes related provisions.
Allows the department of financial services to have additional oversight of banks and insurance companies that are not currently licensed in this state; provides penalties for violations.