New York Assembly Bill A08524

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/20/25
• Refer: 5/20/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Postpones the implementation and enforcement of advanced clean cars II regulations by the department of environmental conservation.

Summary

This bill would delay New York’s implementation and enforcement of the Advanced Clean Cars II regulations. Under the bill, the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) would be prohibited from enforcing the regulations to the extent they require manufacturers of passenger cars and light-duty trucks to increase sales of zero-emission vehicles before January 1, 2028. The measure is framed as a postponement rather than a repeal, and it would take effect immediately if enacted. In practical terms, the bill would alter the timing of New York’s vehicle emissions and zero-emission vehicle sales requirements by pushing back the state’s regulatory schedule. It would affect automobile manufacturers, dealers, and the DEC, and it would temporarily suspend state enforcement of a key climate and transportation policy aimed at accelerating the transition to electric and other zero-emission vehicles.

Impact

The bill would override any conflicting state law, rule, or regulation to prevent the Department of Environmental Conservation from implementing or enforcing Advanced Clean Cars II requirements before January 1, 2028. This would delay the state’s zero-emission vehicle sales mandate for passenger cars and light-duty trucks, affecting manufacturers’ compliance obligations and the DEC’s enforcement authority under New York environmental law.

Sentiment

No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no documented debate or recorded vote to gauge legislative sentiment. Based on the bill text and caption, the measure appears to reflect concern about the pace of implementation of the Advanced Clean Cars II regulations, but the available materials do not show support or opposition from specific lawmakers, agencies, or stakeholders.

Contention

The central point of contention is the timing of New York’s zero-emission vehicle mandate. Supporters of postponement would likely argue that manufacturers and consumers need more time before the regulations take effect, while opponents would likely view the delay as undermining the state’s climate and air-quality goals. Because no transcripts or votes are included, no specific individuals or groups are identified as taking either side.