New York Assembly Bill A07787

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/10/25
• Refer: 4/10/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Excludes persons who, not having entered a lease or license for such dwelling with the rightful owner, enters into a dwelling unit, onto real property or otherwise settles on land or occupies real property without title, right, permission of the rightful owner, or payment of rent accepted by the rightful owner from the definition of "occupant" for the purposes of unlawful eviction.

Summary

Bill A07787 seeks to amend the real property actions and proceedings law in New York by redefining the term "occupant" to exclude individuals who occupy a dwelling without a lease or permission from the rightful owner. This change specifically targets squatters and trespassers, clarifying that such individuals do not have the same rights as legal tenants under the law. The bill aims to streamline the unlawful eviction process by making it easier for property owners to remove unauthorized occupants from their properties.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly impact the legal landscape regarding property rights and eviction processes in New York. By excluding squatters and trespassers from the definition of "occupant," property owners would have greater authority to initiate eviction proceedings without the complications that arise from the current broader definition. This could lead to a more efficient resolution of unlawful occupancy cases, potentially reducing the burden on the judicial system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A07787 appears to be supportive among property owners and landlords who advocate for clearer definitions and stronger protections against unlawful occupancy. However, there may be concerns from tenant advocacy groups who argue that the bill could lead to increased vulnerability for individuals facing housing insecurity, as it may limit their rights in eviction proceedings.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between property rights and tenant protections. Supporters of the bill, primarily property owners and landlords, argue that it is necessary to protect their rights and ensure that they can reclaim their properties without undue delay. Conversely, opponents, including tenant rights advocates, express concern that the bill could disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, potentially leading to unjust evictions without adequate legal recourse.