Allows for the removal of members of the state board of parole by a majority vote in the senate and the assembly; requires three or more members of such board personally interview potential parolees; requires that the determination to parole an incarcerated individual be unanimous.
Summary
Bill A07532 proposes amendments to the executive law regarding the state board of parole. It allows for the removal of board members by a majority vote in both the Senate and Assembly, rather than solely by the Governor. Additionally, the bill mandates that at least three members of the board must personally interview incarcerated individuals prior to their parole eligibility, and that any decision to grant parole must be unanimous among the board members. If parole is denied, the reasons must be provided in detail within two weeks, and a date for reconsideration must be set within 24 months.
Impact
If enacted, this bill would significantly alter the procedures surrounding parole determinations in New York State. The requirement for a unanimous decision for parole could lead to a more thorough evaluation process, potentially affecting the number of individuals granted parole. Furthermore, the removal process for board members would shift from a gubernatorial power to a legislative one, which may influence the composition and decisions of the board in the future. The bill also emphasizes the importance of transparency in the parole process by requiring detailed explanations for parole denials.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding Bill A07532 appears to be mixed, with some legislators supporting the increased oversight and accountability of the parole board, while others express concerns about the potential for political influence in parole decisions. The lack of recorded votes or committee discussions indicates that the bill may still be in the early stages of consideration, and further debate is likely as it progresses through the legislative process.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the shift of power regarding the removal of parole board members from the Governor to the legislature, which some argue could politicize the parole process. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous decisions may be seen as overly restrictive, potentially hindering the board's ability to make timely parole decisions. These concerns are likely held by legislators who prioritize swift and efficient parole processes versus those advocating for increased accountability.
Same As
Allows for the removal of members of the state board of parole by a majority vote in the senate and the assembly; requires three or more members of such board personally interview potential parolees; requires that the determination to parole an incarcerated individual be unanimous.
Allows for the removal of members of the state board of parole by a majority vote in the senate and the assembly; requires three or more members of such board personally interview potential parolees; requires that the determination to parole an incarcerated individual be unanimous.
Allows for the removal of members of the state board of parole by a majority vote in the senate and the assembly; requires three or more members of such board personally interview potential parolees; requires that the determination to parole an incarcerated individual be unanimous.
Relates to incarcerated individual interviews by the state board of parole; requires such parole board interviews of incarcerated individuals to be conducted in person and in the correctional facility where such incarcerated individual is housed.
Establishes the parole board accountability act which requires incarcerated individuals who are released on parole, via a vote that is not unanimous, be placed in the community where one of the two board members primarily reside; establishes the procedure of which of the two board member's community the releasee shall be released to.
Establishes the parole board accountability act which requires incarcerated individuals who are released on parole, via a vote that is not unanimous, be placed in the community where one of the two board members primarily reside; establishes the procedure of which of the two board member's community the releasee shall be released to.