New York Assembly Bill A07191

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/21/25
• Refer: 3/21/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Provides procedures to be followed in appointing a hearing officer for removal and disciplinary action against certain public employees not in the service of the city of New York, including the fees to be paid for such hearing officer; provides for suspension, with pay, pending the determination.

Summary

Bill A07191 amends the civil service law to establish new procedures for disciplinary hearings involving public employees in New York State, particularly those not employed by the city of New York. It ensures that employees facing potential disciplinary action have the right to representation by their certified or recognized employee organization and mandates that they be notified in writing of this right. The bill also stipulates that if an employee cannot secure representation within a reasonable timeframe, the employer may proceed with questioning. Additionally, it introduces provisions for the appointment of hearing officers and outlines the process for suspensions pending disciplinary determinations, ensuring that employees are suspended with pay during this period.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the civil service procedures for public employees in New York State by standardizing the disciplinary process and enhancing employee rights during disciplinary hearings. It modifies existing laws to ensure that employees are afforded proper representation and outlines the responsibilities of hearing officers. This legislation aims to create a more equitable and transparent process for handling disciplinary actions, which could lead to changes in how public employers manage employee conduct and disciplinary measures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A07191 appears to be supportive among employee advocacy groups and labor organizations, as it strengthens employee rights and protections during disciplinary proceedings. However, there may be concerns from some public employers regarding the potential implications for administrative efficiency and the costs associated with the new hearing officer procedures. Overall, discussions indicate a recognition of the need for fair representation in disciplinary matters.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential costs associated with hiring independent hearing officers, which may be a concern for public employers. Additionally, some stakeholders may argue about the balance between employee rights and the need for effective management of public services. The bill's provisions for suspensions with pay may also raise questions regarding accountability and the implications for public sector operations.