Relates to posting the names of individuals who are authorized to sign state contracts; eliminates unfavorable terms in state contracts.
Summary
This bill would require each state department that maintains a public website to post and keep current a webpage listing the names of individuals authorized to execute contracts on the department’s behalf, as filed with the state comptroller. The stated purpose is to give the public clear notice of who can bind the department or the state in contract matters.
The bill also adds a new rule making certain contract terms void and unenforceable in contracts entered into by the state or any department. It would prohibit clauses requiring the state to indemnify or hold harmless another party, clauses allowing a contractor to unilaterally change contract terms, clauses limiting another party’s liability for bodily injury, death, or property damage caused by negligence or willful misconduct, and clauses selecting another jurisdiction’s law to govern the contract, with limited exceptions for agreements with sister states or the federal government.
Impact
The bill would amend the state finance law by adding a public disclosure requirement for contract signatories and by creating a new section that invalidates specified contract provisions in state contracts. In practice, it would affect state agencies, contractors doing business with the state, and the legal review of procurement and contracting documents, while reinforcing New York law as the default governing law for state contracts.
Sentiment
The available record shows no committee transcript or recorded votes, so there is no documented debate or formal vote history to gauge support or opposition. Based on the bill text, the measure appears aimed at transparency and protecting the state’s contracting position, suggesting a generally reform-oriented and oversight-focused intent.
Contention
The main points of contention would likely involve the limits the bill places on contract negotiation and standard commercial terms. Contractors and agency counsel may object to the categorical ban on indemnification, unilateral amendment clauses, liability limitations, and out-of-state governing law provisions, while supporters would likely argue these restrictions protect the state from unfavorable or overly one-sided agreements and improve public accountability by identifying authorized signatories.
Professions and Businesses; repeal Chapter 14, relating to electrical contractors, plumbers, conditioned air contractors, low voltage contractors, and utility contractors and enact a new Chapter 14
Limits amount of payment that State agency as property owner may withhold from certain contractors on State construction contracts to two percent of amount due.