New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A06269

Introduced
3/3/25  
Refer
3/3/25  

Caption

Prohibits broad indemnification by a design professional of a state or local agency or political subdivision involving public work for contracts except to the extent that damages were caused by or the result of the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional.

Summary

Bill A06269 amends the general municipal law, public authorities law, and state finance law to limit the liability of design professionals in contracts with municipal and state authorities. Specifically, it prohibits any contractual requirement for design professionals to indemnify or defend these authorities against claims, except in cases where the claims arise from the design professional's own negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. This change aims to protect design professionals from being held liable for issues outside their control and to ensure that liability is proportionate to fault.

Impact

The bill will significantly alter the landscape of liability for design professionals in New York. By making indemnification clauses void unless they pertain to the design professional's own misconduct, it will reduce the financial risk associated with public contracts for these professionals. This could lead to increased participation of design professionals in public projects, potentially enhancing the quality and efficiency of public works. Additionally, it may necessitate revisions to existing contracts and practices within municipal and state agencies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A06269 appears to be generally supportive among design professionals and their advocates, who argue that the bill provides necessary protections against unfair liability. However, there may be concerns from municipal and state agencies about the implications for risk management and accountability in public projects. The absence of recorded votes or detailed committee discussions makes it difficult to gauge the full range of opinions on the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between protecting design professionals and ensuring accountability for public works. Some municipal representatives may argue that limiting liability could lead to less rigorous standards and oversight in public contracts. Conversely, design professionals may contend that the current indemnification requirements are excessively burdensome and deter them from engaging in public projects. The debate centers around the appropriate level of risk that should be borne by design professionals versus public agencies.

Companion Bills

NY S05364

Same As Prohibits broad indemnification by a design professional of a state or local agency or political subdivision involving public work for contracts except to the extent that damages were caused by or the result of the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional.

Similar Bills

CA AB586

Professional fiduciaries.

AZ SB1656

family court; professional personnel; requirements

CA AB1796

Licensed Professional Interior Designer Practice Act.

TN SB2399

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 33; Title 36; Title 49; Title 52; Title 56; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to professional counselors.

TN HB1917

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 33; Title 36; Title 49; Title 52; Title 56; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to professional counselors.

MI HB4728

Occupations: individual licensing and registration; licensure of professional guardians and conservators; require. Amends sec. 303a of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.303a) & adds art. 14A.

FL S0888

Professional Services Contracts

AZ SB1147

family court; post decree; experts