New York Assembly Bill A05967

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Authorizes the town of Smithtown, in the county of Suffolk to make ordinances prohibiting the discharge of longbows and crossbows in areas in which such activity may be hazardous to the general public or nearby residents.

Summary

Bill A05967 amends the town law to grant the town of Smithtown, located in Suffolk County, the authority to create ordinances that regulate the discharge of longbows and crossbows. Specifically, the bill allows the town to prohibit such activities in areas deemed hazardous to the general public or nearby residents. The proposed regulations would also require the posting of signs to inform the public about these restrictions. Additionally, the bill stipulates that any changes to existing distance regulations must be communicated to the regional supervisor of fish and game at least thirty days prior to adoption.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would empower the town of Smithtown to implement more stringent regulations regarding the use of longbows and crossbows than those currently established by state law. This could lead to enhanced public safety in residential areas and potentially reduce accidents or incidents related to the use of these weapons. The bill's provisions may also set a precedent for other towns in New York to seek similar authority, thereby influencing local governance and public safety measures across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A05967 appears to be cautiously supportive, as it addresses public safety concerns related to the discharge of longbows and crossbows in populated areas. However, there may be some opposition from hunting and archery enthusiasts who feel that such regulations could infringe on their rights or activities. The absence of recorded votes or committee discussions suggests that the bill is still in the early stages of consideration and may require further debate.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from stakeholders such as local hunters, archery clubs, and residents who may have differing views on the necessity and extent of the proposed regulations. While some residents may advocate for stricter controls to ensure safety, others may argue that these restrictions could limit recreational activities and infringe on personal freedoms. The balance between public safety and individual rights is likely to be a key point of discussion as the bill progresses.