New York Assembly Bill A05815

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Relates to orders of protection with respect to companion animals; provides further protection for pets by authorizing the court to order a party to either relinquish a pet or to refrain from any contact with a pet.

Summary

Bill A05815 seeks to amend various sections of the Family Court Act, Criminal Procedure Law, and Domestic Relations Law to enhance the protection of companion animals in the context of orders of protection. The bill allows courts to issue orders that not only require a respondent to stay away from the petitioner but also to refrain from harming or killing any companion animals owned or possessed by the petitioner or their minor children. Furthermore, the bill grants exclusive care, custody, or control of such animals to the petitioner, thereby ensuring that the safety of pets is considered alongside the safety of individuals in domestic violence situations.

Impact

The bill's passage would significantly impact state laws regarding domestic violence and animal welfare by explicitly incorporating companion animals into protective orders. This change would require courts to consider the welfare of pets when issuing orders of protection, thereby aligning legal protections for animals with those for human victims of domestic violence. It would amend existing laws to ensure that the rights of pet owners are recognized and enforced in legal proceedings, potentially leading to increased awareness and consideration of animal welfare in domestic violence cases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A05815 appears to be generally supportive, as discussions highlight the importance of protecting companion animals in domestic violence situations. Advocates for animal rights and domestic violence prevention have expressed approval for the bill, emphasizing its potential to provide comprehensive protection for both victims and their pets. However, there may be some concerns regarding the implementation and enforcement of such orders, particularly in terms of resource allocation for animal welfare.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the practical implications of enforcing such orders, particularly in cases where the respondent may not comply with the court's directives regarding animal care and custody. Some stakeholders may express concerns about the potential burden on the court system and law enforcement in monitoring compliance with these new provisions. Additionally, there may be differing opinions on the extent to which companion animals should be included in legal protections, with some arguing that the focus should primarily remain on human victims.