New York Assembly Bill A04813

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/25
• Refer: 2/6/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Prohibits state funding of any degree-granting institution of higher education if such institution permits terrorist organizations or activities in support of such organizations on campus; prohibits any student group or organization of receiving funding from the degree-granting institution if such group or organization directly or indirectly promotes, encourages, advocates, or engages in any terrorist advocacy or activities on campus.

Summary

Bill A04813 seeks to amend the education law in New York by prohibiting any degree-granting institution of higher education from receiving state funding if it allows organizations or activities that support terrorist organizations on its campus. Specifically, it targets groups that promote or engage in activities related to organizations designated as terrorist under federal law. The bill mandates that the commissioner of education will create regulations to enforce these provisions, including barring any student groups that advocate for such organizations from receiving funding or using campus facilities.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly alter the funding landscape for higher education institutions in New York. Institutions that allow any form of support for designated terrorist organizations would face the loss of state financial aid and appropriations. This could lead to increased scrutiny of campus organizations and activities, potentially affecting the autonomy of student groups and the broader educational environment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A04813 appears to be mixed, as indicated by the voting results from the Assembly Higher Education Committee, which saw 15 votes in favor and 8 against. Supporters argue that the bill is necessary to ensure that state funds do not support extremist activities, while opponents may view it as an infringement on free speech and academic freedom.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the bill's implications for free speech and the potential for overreach in defining what constitutes support for terrorist organizations. Critics may argue that the bill could lead to the suppression of legitimate political discourse on campuses, while supporters emphasize the need for accountability in the use of public funds.