New York Assembly Bill A04760

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/25
• Refer: 2/6/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Defines the term "mass shooting" for purposes of emergency response measures and access to emergency funding as a shooting incident in which at least four people are murdered or injured with a firearm, rifle, or shotgun.

Summary

Bill A04760 seeks to amend the executive law of New York by defining the term 'mass shooting' specifically for the purposes of emergency response measures and access to emergency funding. Under this bill, a mass shooting is characterized as an incident where at least four individuals are either murdered or injured with a firearm, rifle, or shotgun. This definition aims to provide clarity and establish a framework for how such incidents are addressed within the state's emergency response protocols.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws includes a formalized definition of mass shooting, which could influence how emergency services are mobilized in response to such incidents. By specifying the criteria for a mass shooting, the bill may also affect the allocation of emergency funding and resources to support victims and communities affected by these events. Additionally, this amendment may lead to changes in reporting and data collection regarding gun violence incidents in New York.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding Bill A04760 appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for clearer definitions in gun violence legislation. However, there may be concerns from some groups about the implications of defining mass shootings in this manner, especially regarding the potential for increased scrutiny on gun-related incidents. As of now, there have been no recorded votes or significant opposition expressed in committee discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from differing opinions on the definition of mass shooting itself. Some advocates for gun control may argue that the threshold of four victims is too high, while others may contend that it is necessary to focus on incidents that result in significant harm. Additionally, there may be discussions about the adequacy of emergency response measures and funding in relation to the defined term, with various stakeholders holding differing views on the effectiveness of current policies.