Extends limitations on the shift between classes of taxable property in the town of Orangetown, County of Rockland for the 2025--2026 assessment rolls.
Summary
A04390 is a local property tax administration bill for the Town of Orangetown in Rockland County. It amends the Real Property Tax Law to extend, for one additional assessment year, a special limitation on how much the current base proportion of any property class may increase relative to the prior year. Specifically, for the 2025-2026 assessment rolls, the bill continues the rule that no class’s current base proportion may rise by more than 1 percent over the immediately preceding year, so long as the town has adopted the required local law, ordinance, or resolution.
The measure is narrowly tailored to Orangetown and applies only to an approved assessing unit that has opted into the limitation. If the normal calculation of class proportions would exceed the cap, the local legislative body must adjust the proportions so they still total one. The bill takes effect immediately and functions as a continuation of an existing property tax stabilization mechanism that had already been extended in prior law.
Impact
The bill amends section 1903 of the Real Property Tax Law to add the 2025-2026 assessment rolls to the list of years covered by Orangetown’s special class-shift limitation. Its practical effect is to constrain how quickly the tax burden can shift between classes of taxable property in that town, which can affect residential, commercial, and other property classes depending on the local assessment mix. It does not create a statewide change; rather, it preserves a local option available only to the approved assessing unit in Orangetown, contingent on local enactment.
Sentiment
The available voting history suggests broad bipartisan support and little controversy. The bill advanced unanimously or near-unanimously through committee and passed both the Assembly and Senate with overwhelming margins, indicating that lawmakers generally viewed it as a routine local tax measure. The absence of committee transcript opposition also suggests the proposal was treated as a technical extension rather than a disputed policy change.
Contention
There is no recorded substantive debate in the provided materials, and no committee transcript is available. The only likely point of policy interest is the continued use of a special cap on shifts between property classes, which can be seen as stabilizing tax bills for some property owners while limiting flexibility in local tax distribution. Any contention would therefore be local and structural rather than partisan: whether Orangetown should continue the 1 percent limit for another year and maintain the existing balance among property classes.
Same As
Extends limitations on the shift between classes of taxable property in the town of Orangetown, County of Rockland for the 2025--2026 assessment rolls.
Extends limitations on the shift between classes of taxable property in the town of Orangetown, County of Rockland for the 2026--2027 assessment rolls.
Extends limitations on the shift between classes of taxable property in the town of Orangetown, County of Rockland for the 2026--2027 assessment rolls.
Extends limitations on the shift between classes of taxable property in the town of Clarkstown, county of Rockland for an additional year for 2026-2027.
Extends limitations on the shift between classes of taxable property in the town of Clarkstown, county of Rockland for an additional year for 2026-2027.
Extends limitations on the shift between classes of taxable property in the town of Orangetown, County of Rockland for the 2025--2026 assessment rolls.