New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A04355

Introduced
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  

Caption

Requires landlords to return the full security deposit and any accrued interest to which the tenant is entitled less any amount retained by the landlord within 21 days of the end of the lease.

Summary

Bill A04355 amends the general obligations law to establish clear guidelines for landlords regarding the return of security deposits. It mandates that landlords must return the full security deposit, along with any accrued interest, within 21 days of the lease's expiration, unless deductions are justified. The bill defines 'security deposit' and outlines the responsibilities of landlords and tenants, including the requirement for landlords to provide a written statement detailing any deductions made from the security deposit, supported by photographic evidence and receipts for repairs.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts landlord-tenant relationships in New York by enforcing stricter regulations on the handling of security deposits. It limits the amount of security deposit to two months' rent and introduces penalties for landlords who wrongfully withhold deposits, including potential treble damages and attorney fees. This change aims to protect tenants from unjustified retention of their deposits and enhance transparency in the rental process.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around Bill A04355 appears to be supportive among tenant advocacy groups, who view it as a necessary measure to protect renters' rights. However, some landlords express concerns about the potential administrative burden and the implications of the penalties for non-compliance. The absence of recorded votes or committee discussions suggests that the bill may still be in early stages of consideration.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the perceived fairness of the penalties imposed on landlords for wrongful retention of security deposits and the administrative requirements for documentation and reporting. Landlords argue that the burden of proof placed on them could lead to disputes and increased litigation, while tenant advocates emphasize the need for stronger protections against unfair practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.