New York Assembly Bill A04092

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/25
• Refer: 1/31/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Makes it a class A-1 felony to sell or transport an opiate controlled substance which causes the death of another person.

Summary

Bill A04092, also known as 'Laree's Law', aims to amend the New York penal law by establishing a new offense termed 'homicide by sale of an opiate controlled substance'. This legislation defines an 'opiate controlled substance' and stipulates that a person can be charged with homicide if they unlawfully sell or transport such substances and their actions result in another person's death. The bill classifies this offense as a class A-I felony, which carries severe penalties, including a potential life sentence.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will significantly alter the legal landscape regarding drug-related offenses in New York. It introduces a new category of homicide specifically related to the sale and distribution of opiate controlled substances, thereby increasing the legal repercussions for individuals involved in the trafficking of these drugs. This change aims to address the ongoing opioid crisis by holding sellers accountable for the consequences of their actions, particularly in cases leading to fatal overdoses.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A04092 appears to be supportive among lawmakers who view it as a necessary step to combat the opioid epidemic. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of classifying such offenses as homicide, particularly regarding the potential for disproportionate sentencing and the impact on individuals struggling with addiction. The lack of recorded votes or committee discussions at this stage suggests that the bill is still in the early phases of consideration.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the definition of joint possession and use of opiate controlled substances, as the bill provides a defense for individuals who jointly acquire these substances with the deceased. Critics may argue that this could complicate prosecutions and lead to challenges in determining culpability. Additionally, there may be debates on whether the penalties are appropriate or if they could disproportionately affect certain populations, particularly those struggling with addiction.