New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A02503

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/17/25  

Caption

Relates to disclosure authorization and reporting requirements for the START-UP NY program.

Summary

This bill amends New York’s Economic Development Law to expand public disclosure and reporting requirements for the START-UP NY program, which offers tax benefits to businesses located in tax-free NY areas. It requires the Department of Economic Development to publicly disclose the names and addresses of participating businesses, along with additional application and annual-report information the commissioner deems relevant to evaluating the program’s success, including projected net new jobs. The bill also requires the commissioner to prepare a more detailed annual report to the governor and legislature, covering the number of applicants and approvals, benefits distributed, benefits per business, net new jobs created, investment per business, and industry types represented. Participating businesses would have to file annual reports containing information sufficient to monitor ongoing eligibility, evaluate program performance, and report wages paid to employees in net new jobs. The department would also have to post an annual program report on its website beginning March 1, 2026. In addition to reporting changes, the bill tightens and clarifies eligibility-related filing obligations for businesses in the program. It adds a requirement that businesses complete and timely file the annual report after their first year in START-UP NY and thereafter, and it updates cross-references and conditions for businesses that previously operated in New York or are expanding existing operations into a tax-free NY area. The bill preserves the commissioner’s discretion to allow certain relocated or expanding businesses to apply if they demonstrate job restoration or net new job creation without eliminating jobs elsewhere in the state. The bill’s impact would be to increase transparency and oversight of START-UP NY, while also giving state officials more data to assess whether the program is producing jobs, investment, and economic benefits. It would affect the Department of Economic Development, the Department of Taxation and Finance, and businesses participating in or seeking to participate in tax-free NY areas, especially by making business identities and performance metrics publicly available and by imposing more detailed annual reporting obligations. No committee discussion or votes were provided, so the overall sentiment cannot be measured from recorded debate. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears generally supportive of accountability and program evaluation rather than expansion of tax benefits, and the main likely point of contention is privacy and administrative burden versus public transparency and oversight. Businesses participating in START-UP NY may object to public disclosure of names, addresses, wages, and other application data, while supporters would likely emphasize the need to evaluate whether the tax incentive is delivering promised economic development results.

Impact

The bill would amend the Economic Development Law by creating a new section governing disclosure and reporting for START-UP NY, requiring public release of participating businesses’ names and addresses and expanding annual reporting to the governor, legislature, and public website. It would also require participating businesses to submit annual reports with eligibility, job, wage, and investment data, and it would add a new ongoing filing condition for continued participation. These changes would primarily affect the Department of Economic Development, the Department of Taxation and Finance, and businesses located in tax-free NY areas.

Sentiment

No votes or committee transcripts were provided, so there is no recorded legislative sentiment to summarize. From the bill text, the measure appears to be framed as an oversight and transparency bill, suggesting a generally favorable posture toward accountability and evaluation of the START-UP NY program. Any opposition would likely center on disclosure of business information and the added compliance burden on participating firms.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the balance between transparency and confidentiality. Supporters would likely favor public disclosure of participating businesses, job creation figures, benefits received, and other performance data to assess whether START-UP NY is effective. Opponents may argue that publishing business names, addresses, wages, and application details could burden companies, discourage participation, or expose sensitive information. A secondary issue is the added reporting and compliance burden on businesses and state agencies, though the bill also preserves commissioner discretion for certain relocated or expanding businesses that can demonstrate job creation or restoration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NY A03265

Relates to disclosure authorization and reporting requirements for the START-UP NY program.

NJ S1067

Increases reporting requirements for the NJ Basic Skills Training Program for Economic Growth.

NJ A4722

Revises reporting requirements for nursing homes concerning financial disclosures and ownership structure.

NJ S2980

Revises reporting requirements for nursing homes concerning financial disclosures and ownership structure.

NJ S1750

Enhances certain reporting and disclosure concerning State tax expenditures.

MN HF3882

Metropolitan Council program requirements modified, reporting requirements modified, Metropolitan Council and regional development commission review of city housing finance programs removed, and technical corrections made.

NJ S2652

Expands entities that may acquire opioid antidotes; creates program within DOH and formalizes reporting requirements.

MO SB1178

Enacts requirements for certain reporting regarding the federal 340B drug program

MO SB1213

Enacts requirements for certain reporting regarding the federal 340B drug program

MN HF3883

Metropolitan Council program, contracts, and reporting requirements to the legislature modified; Metropolitan Council and regional development commission review city housing finance programs removed; and technical corrections made.

Similar Bills

AL HB443

Article V Convention; process for appointing commissioners and alternate commissioners to represent the State of Alabama at Article V Convention established

CT SJ00039

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

TN HB1499

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 18, relative to Article V conventions.

TN SB1567

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 18, relative to Article V conventions.

CT SJ00058

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

CA AB1936

Insurance Commissioner qualifications.

MI HCR0002

A concurrent resolution prescribing the Rules of the Legislature for Selecting Commissioners to an Article V Convention.

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.