New York Assembly Bill A02228

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/15/25
• Refer: 1/15/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Requires a criminal history background check for the purchase of a three-dimensional printer capable of creating firearms; prohibits sale to a person who would be disqualified on the basis of criminal history from being granted a license to possess a firearm.

Summary

Bill A02228 seeks to amend the general business law in New York by requiring retailers to conduct criminal history background checks for individuals purchasing three-dimensional printers capable of creating firearms or firearm components. The bill mandates that retailers request and receive criminal history information from the division of criminal justice services, which will determine if the purchaser has any felony convictions or outstanding warrants that would disqualify them from legally possessing a firearm. The bill aims to enhance public safety by preventing individuals with serious criminal backgrounds from acquiring technology that could be used to manufacture firearms illegally.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would create new regulations for the sale of three-dimensional printers in New York, specifically targeting those capable of printing firearms. It would establish a legal requirement for background checks similar to those currently in place for traditional firearm sales, thereby aligning the regulation of advanced manufacturing technologies with existing firearm laws. This could lead to increased scrutiny of sales and potentially deter individuals with criminal histories from attempting to purchase such printers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A02228 appears to be cautious but generally supportive among lawmakers concerned about gun violence and the implications of 3D printing technology. Discussions indicate a recognition of the need for regulation in this emerging area, although there may be concerns about the feasibility and enforcement of background checks for technology that is not traditionally regulated as firearms are.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the practicality of implementing background checks for 3D printer sales, particularly regarding the speed and efficiency of processing these checks. Some stakeholders may argue that such regulations could hinder innovation and access to technology for legitimate users, while others emphasize the importance of preventing dangerous individuals from obtaining tools that could facilitate illegal firearm manufacturing. The balance between public safety and technological advancement is likely to be a key debate point.