Expands requirements for regulatory impact statements to include discussion of potential benefits and cost savings; creates New York state regulatory review council to review every promulgation, repeal or amendment of every rule or regulation; provides that no new rule, unless critical to health, safety, or welfare, may become effective without the approval of the council; provides for the procedures of the council; provides for an annual report by the council on its actions.
Summary
Bill A01982 seeks to amend the New York State Administrative Procedure Act by establishing the New York State Regulatory Review Council. This council will be responsible for reviewing all proposed rules and regulations, ensuring that no new rule can take effect without its approval unless it is deemed critical for public health, safety, or welfare. The bill also expands the requirements for regulatory impact statements to include a more comprehensive analysis of potential benefits, costs, and alternatives associated with proposed rules, thereby enhancing transparency and accountability in the regulatory process.
Impact
The bill significantly impacts the regulatory landscape in New York by introducing a formal review process for all new rules and regulations. It mandates that regulatory impact statements provide detailed analyses of benefits and costs, which could lead to more informed decision-making by agencies and potentially reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens. Additionally, the establishment of the Regulatory Review Council may streamline the rule-making process and ensure that regulations align more closely with legislative intent and public interest.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding Bill A01982 appears to be mixed, with proponents advocating for increased oversight and accountability in the regulatory process, while opponents may express concerns about potential delays in rule implementation and the added bureaucratic layer. The lack of voting history and committee discussions makes it difficult to gauge the overall support or opposition among lawmakers.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between necessary regulation for public welfare and the potential for bureaucratic delays in implementing important rules. Some stakeholders may argue that the council's approval process could hinder timely responses to urgent public health or safety issues. Additionally, there may be differing opinions on the adequacy of the expanded regulatory impact statements and whether they will truly enhance the rule-making process or create additional burdens for agencies.
Amends existing law to provide that cities with 25,000 residents or less may provide for election of councilmen by districts and that cities with greater than 25,000 residents shall provide for the election of councilmen by districts.
Amends existing law to provide that cities with 25,000 residents or less may provide for election of councilmen by districts and that cities with greater than 25,000 residents shall provide for the election of councilmen by districts.
Administrative procedure: rules; process for promulgating rules and creation of the joint committee on regulatory oversight and administrative review; provide for. Amends, adds & repeals (See bill). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5817'26
Metropolitan Council; removal of members of the council for cause authorized, governor appointment of a vice-chair provided, council member salary and benefits specified, and annual reviews of the regional administrator by the council required.