New York Assembly Bill A01325

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/25
• Refer: 1/9/25
• Report Pass: 3/25/25
• Refer: 3/25/25
• Report Pass: 4/29/25
• Refer: 4/29/25
• Report Pass: 4/30/25
• Engrossed: 4/30/25
• Refer: 4/30/25
• Engrossed: 1/12/26
• Refer: 1/12/26

Caption

Requires all incarcerated individuals who do not have a high-school diploma or its equivalent to receive a reading proficiency level assessment and dyslexia screening upon intake by the department of corrections; requires for such individuals who perform below a certain proficiency level to be provided with intervention services that are evidence-based, effective and consistent with science-based research specifically tailored to addressing dyslexia.

Summary

Bill A01325 mandates that all incarcerated individuals without a high school diploma or its equivalent undergo a reading proficiency assessment and dyslexia screening during the intake process at correctional facilities. If an individual is found to be below a specified reading proficiency level, they are to receive evidence-based dyslexia intervention tailored to their needs. The bill also requires that teachers in correctional facilities be trained in effective reading instruction practices and that intervention services be provided by licensed professionals.

Impact

This legislation will amend the correction law in New York by instituting mandatory educational assessments and interventions for a vulnerable population within the correctional system. It aims to improve literacy rates among incarcerated individuals, which may lead to better rehabilitation outcomes and lower recidivism rates. The bill also emphasizes the need for trained educators and structured intervention programs, potentially impacting the resources and training provided within correctional facilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A01325 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as indicated by the unanimous votes in the Assembly committees and the final floor vote, which passed with a significant majority. Supporters argue that the bill addresses critical educational deficiencies among incarcerated individuals and promotes rehabilitation through literacy.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for the bill, potential points of contention may arise regarding the implementation of the required assessments and interventions, including the adequacy of funding and resources to ensure that licensed professionals are available to provide the necessary services. Some stakeholders may also raise concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed interventions.