New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A01237

Introduced
1/9/25  
Refer
1/9/25  

Caption

Provides that any claim for deceptive acts or practices against a distribution utility providing gas, electric or steam services to the public, the court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over such claim without regard to any defenses alleged; provides that in any claim for false advertising, the court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over such claim.

Summary

Bill A01237 amends the General Business Law to enhance consumer protections against deceptive acts and practices, particularly concerning distribution utilities that provide gas, electric, or steam services. It grants individuals the right to bring legal action against such utilities for violations, allowing them to seek actual damages or a minimum of fifty dollars, whichever is greater. The bill also stipulates that courts will have exclusive jurisdiction over these claims, ensuring that defenses raised by the utilities cannot prevent the court from adjudicating the merits of the claims.

Impact

The bill's passage would strengthen consumer rights and protections in New York by allowing individuals to directly sue utilities for deceptive practices without being hindered by potential defenses. It modifies existing laws regarding false advertising and deceptive acts, making it easier for consumers to seek redress. This could lead to increased accountability for utilities and potentially higher compliance costs as they adapt to the stricter legal framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment around Bill A01237 appears to be generally supportive among consumer advocacy groups, as it enhances protections for consumers against deceptive practices. However, there may be concerns from utility companies regarding the implications of exclusive jurisdiction and the potential for increased litigation, which could lead to higher operational costs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications for distribution utilities, which may argue that the exclusive jurisdiction clause could limit their ability to defend against claims. Consumer advocates, on the other hand, support the bill for providing necessary protections and ensuring that consumers can effectively seek justice without being obstructed by legal defenses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NY SB1022

Small claims court; jurisdictional limit

NY HB364

Small claims court; jurisdictional limit.

NY AB1827

Small claims court: jurisdiction.

NY SB0125

Marion County small claims court jurisdiction.

NY SB787

Increasing jurisdictional amounts in small claims actions. (FE)

NY AB779

Increasing jurisdictional amounts in small claims actions. (FE)

NY A08001

Increases the jurisdictional limits for small claims to fifteen thousand dollars.

NY S07735

Permits amendment of a claim or notice of intention to file a claim to correct jurisdictional pleading defects and the dismissal of a claim based upon claimant's failure to comply with jurisdictional pleading requirements.

NY A08047

Permits amendment of a claim or notice of intention to file a claim to correct jurisdictional pleading defects and the dismissal of a claim based upon claimant's failure to comply with jurisdictional pleading requirements.

NY S09792

Permits amendment of a claim or notice of intention to file a claim to correct jurisdictional pleading defects and the dismissal of a claim based upon claimant's failure to comply with jurisdictional pleading requirements.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.