NY
New York Assembly Bill A01182
New York 2025-2026 Regular Session
Menu
NY

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A01182

Introduced
1/9/25  
Refer
1/9/25  

Caption

Provides that the court shall not reduce jury awards as excessive in employment discrimination actions unless the court finds exceptional circumstances which compel the conclusion that the jury was influenced by partiality, prejudice, mistake or corruption or that remittitur or additur is necessary to avoid a complete miscarriage of justice.

Summary

Bill A01182 amends the civil practice law and executive law concerning jury awards for unlawful discriminatory practices related to employment. It stipulates that courts cannot reduce jury awards deemed excessive in cases of employment discrimination unless they find exceptional circumstances indicating jury bias or error. This aims to uphold jury decisions and ensure that victims of discrimination receive fair compensation without the risk of judicial reduction of awards based on subjective assessments of reasonableness.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws regarding employment discrimination by reinforcing the sanctity of jury awards. It establishes a higher threshold for courts to overturn jury verdicts, thereby enhancing protections for individuals claiming discrimination in employment. This change may lead to increased liability for employers and a potential rise in the number of claims filed under the relevant laws, as plaintiffs may feel more confident that their jury awards will be upheld.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around Bill A01182 appears to be supportive among advocates for civil rights and anti-discrimination, who view it as a necessary step to protect victims of discrimination. However, there may be concerns from some business groups about the potential for increased liability and costs associated with employment discrimination claims.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between protecting victims of discrimination and the concerns of employers regarding excessive jury awards. Critics may argue that the bill could lead to higher costs for businesses and discourage hiring, while supporters emphasize the need for robust protections against discrimination in the workplace.

Latest NY A01182 Activity

View All Events: NY 2025-2026 Regular Session A01182

Companion Bills

NY S00410

Same As Provides that the court shall not reduce jury awards as excessive in employment discrimination actions unless the court finds exceptional circumstances which compel the conclusion that the jury was influenced by partiality, prejudice, mistake or corruption.

Previously Filed As

NY S00017

Provides that the court shall not reduce jury awards as excessive in employment discrimination actions unless the court finds exceptional circumstances which compel the conclusion that the jury was influenced by partiality, prejudice, mistake or corruption.

NY A02865

Provides that the court shall not reduce jury awards as excessive in employment discrimination actions unless the court finds exceptional circumstances which compel the conclusion that the jury was influenced by partiality, prejudice, mistake or corruption.

NY S00410

Provides that the court shall not reduce jury awards as excessive in employment discrimination actions unless the court finds exceptional circumstances which compel the conclusion that the jury was influenced by partiality, prejudice, mistake or corruption.

NY A08695

Provides that after an alternate juror has been substituted, the jury shall deliberate anew on all issues submitted to the jury at the outset of deliberations; exempts issues for which a verdict was already rendered.

NY S07695

Provides that after an alternate juror has been substituted, the jury shall deliberate anew on all issues submitted to the jury at the outset of deliberations; exempts issues for which a verdict was already rendered.

NY S09770

Provides that after an alternate juror has been substituted, the jury shall deliberate anew on all issues submitted to the jury at the outset of deliberations; exempts issues for which a verdict was already rendered.

NY S10293

Provides that in an action or proceeding to recover possession of residential real property, the court shall stay the issuance or execution of a warrant of eviction or removal where an owner of record demonstrates that title, ownership, deed validity, conveyance, heirship, inheritance interest, or the right to possess the property is contested in a court of competent jurisdiction, and such stay shall remain in effect until the court in which such interest in the property is contested issues a final judgment unless the court issuing such stay finds good cause to modify or lift such stay.

NY HB2042

Provides that the court shall not order a parent to pay child support to the other parent for reasonable or necessary expenses of the child if the parents are awarded equal time with the child

NY HB3110

Provides that the court shall not order a parent to pay child support to the other parent for reasonable or necessary expenses of the child if the parents are awarded equal time with the child

NY S3315

Clarifies that punitive damages may not be awarded against public entities or public employees acting within the scope of their employment in any action.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.