New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A00768

Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/25  

Caption

Enacts the "New York artificial intelligence consumer protection act", in relation to preventing the use of artificial intelligence algorithms to discriminate against protected classes.

Summary

Bill A00768, known as the "New York Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection Act," aims to amend the general business law to prevent algorithmic discrimination by artificial intelligence (AI) systems against protected classes. The bill establishes definitions for terms such as 'algorithmic discrimination' and 'high-risk artificial intelligence decision system,' and outlines the responsibilities of developers and deployers of such systems. It mandates that developers conduct bias and governance audits, provide necessary documentation, and implement risk management policies to mitigate any foreseeable risks of discrimination arising from their AI systems. The bill also requires transparency in AI interactions with consumers, ensuring that they are informed when an AI system is involved in decision-making processes that affect them significantly.

Impact

The enactment of this bill will create a legal framework that holds developers and deployers of AI systems accountable for preventing discrimination against individuals based on protected characteristics. It will affect various sectors, including education, employment, healthcare, and housing, by imposing requirements for documentation, risk management, and consumer disclosure. The bill aims to enhance consumer protection and promote ethical AI practices in New York State, potentially influencing similar legislation in other jurisdictions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A00768 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with support for its goals of consumer protection and fairness in AI usage. However, there may be concerns regarding the feasibility of compliance for developers and the potential impact on innovation in the AI sector. The lack of recorded votes or committee discussions suggests that the bill is still in the early stages of consideration, and further debate may shape its final form.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the balance between consumer protection and the operational flexibility of AI developers. Some stakeholders may argue that the requirements for audits and documentation could impose significant burdens on businesses, particularly smaller firms, while others may emphasize the necessity of these measures to prevent discrimination and ensure ethical AI deployment. The specifics of what constitutes 'reasonable care' in risk management and the implications of compliance for various sectors may also be debated.

Companion Bills

NY S01962

Same As Enacts the "New York artificial intelligence consumer protection act", in relation to preventing the use of artificial intelligence algorithms to discriminate against protected classes.

Similar Bills

HI HB1887

Relating To Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education.

HI SB2212

Relating To Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education.

CA SB813

California AI Standards and Safety Commission: independent verification organizations.

HI SB2923

Relating To Artificial Intelligence.

NJ A4352

Requires school districts to provide instruction on artificial intelligence; requires Secretary of Higher Education to develop artificial intelligence model curricula.

NJ S2860

Establishes Artificial Intelligence Apprenticeship Program and artificial intelligence apprenticeship tax credit program.

CA SB420

An act to add Chapter 24.

CA AB1137

Reporting mechanism: child sexual abuse material.