New York Assembly Bill A00653

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Prohibits the governing board of a municipal corporation from adopting any law, ordinance, regulation or policy that prohibits, or has the effect of prohibiting, the connection or reconnection of a utility service to a customer based upon the type or source of energy to be delivered to the customer.

Summary

Bill A00653 seeks to amend the general municipal law in New York by prohibiting municipal corporations from enacting laws, ordinances, regulations, or policies that would prevent the delivery of utility services based on the type or source of energy. Specifically, it aims to ensure that utility services such as natural gas, propane, and fuel oil cannot be denied to customers solely due to the energy type they wish to use. This legislation is intended to maintain access to various energy sources for consumers and prevent local governments from restricting energy options.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would have significant implications for local governance in New York, as it would limit the authority of municipal corporations to regulate utility services based on energy types. This could affect local policies aimed at promoting renewable energy sources or reducing reliance on fossil fuels, as municipalities would be unable to restrict utility services based on the energy source. Consequently, the bill may reinforce the continued use of fossil fuels in certain areas, potentially impacting environmental policies at the local level.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A00653 appears to be mixed, with proponents arguing that it protects consumer choice and ensures access to essential utility services. However, there may also be concerns from environmental advocates who fear that the bill could hinder efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources. The lack of voting history and committee discussions makes it challenging to gauge the full spectrum of opinions on the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between consumer choice and environmental responsibility. Supporters of the bill, primarily from certain political factions, argue that it safeguards the rights of consumers to choose their energy sources without local restrictions. Conversely, environmental advocates and some local government officials may oppose the bill, viewing it as a barrier to implementing more sustainable energy policies and reducing carbon emissions.