Nevada Assembly Bill AB564

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/14/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Report Pass: 5/26/25
• Engrossed: 5/27/25
• Refer: 5/27/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Enrolled: 6/1/25
• Chaptered: 6/6/25
• Passed: 6/6/25

Caption

Makes an appropriation to the Fleet Services Division of the Department of Administration for the replacement and purchase of vehicles. (BDR S-1183)

Summary

AB564 appropriates $13,131,324 from the State General Fund to the Nevada Department of Administration’s Fleet Services Division for the replacement and purchase of vehicles. The measure is a straightforward funding bill intended to support the state vehicle fleet, likely covering aging or high-use vehicles used by state agencies. It also sets a deadline for spending the money, requiring any uncommitted balance to stop being committed after June 30, 2027, and any remaining funds to revert to the General Fund by September 17, 2027. The bill does not create a new regulatory program or change substantive policy; instead, it authorizes a one-time appropriation and imposes standard fiscal controls on the use of the funds. Its practical effect is to update and maintain the state’s fleet operations, which can affect the Department of Administration and any agencies that rely on state-owned vehicles for transportation, field work, or service delivery.

Impact

AB564 amends state finances by directing General Fund dollars to the Fleet Services Division for vehicle replacement and acquisition. It affects the Department of Administration’s ability to manage the state vehicle fleet, but it does not alter broader statutory duties or private-party rights. The bill’s sunset and reversion language limits the appropriation’s availability and ensures unused funds return to the General Fund.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been noncontroversial and broadly supported. It passed the Assembly 42-0 and the Senate 20-0, indicating unanimous approval in both chambers. With no recorded committee transcript debate provided, the available voting history suggests general agreement that the appropriation was necessary and routine.

Contention

No notable points of contention are evident in the available record. Because the bill is a targeted capital and operations appropriation for state fleet vehicles, any discussion would likely have centered on the amount requested, the timing of vehicle replacement, or budget priorities, but no opposition or recorded disputes are shown. The unanimous votes indicate that, if concerns existed, they did not rise to the level of recorded dissent.