AN ACT relating to governmental administration; providing that a meeting between an agency or officer of the Executive Department of the State Government and the Legislature concerning certain topics relating to cybersecurity is not subject to the Open Meeting Law; prohibiting the disclosure of certain information and materials received during or prepared for such a meeting; creating and setting forth the duties of the Security Operations Center within the Office of Information Security and Cyber Defense within the Governor's Technology Office within the Office of the Governor; creating the Account for the Security Operations Center and prescribing the use of money in the Account; requiring the Security Operations Center to prepare an annual report that assesses the effectiveness of the Security Operations Center; requiring the Security Operations Center, to the extent funding is available, to develop the Cybersecurity Talent Pipeline Program; revising the purpose of the Governor's Technology Office; authorizing the board of trustees of a school district to use the services and equipment of the Governor's Technology Office; making various other changes relating to the cybersecurity of governmental entities; making appropriations; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Summary
This bill declares void the regulations adopted by the Colorado River Commission of Nevada and codified in NAC 321.100 through 321.230, which govern the development and disposal of land in the Fort Mohave Valley. It also directs the Legislative Counsel to remove those regulations from the Nevada Administrative Code in future supplements after the bill takes effect.
The measure is a targeted administrative cleanup bill tied to the transfer of authority over the Fort Mohave Valley Development Law from the Colorado River Commission to the Clark County Board of County Commissioners in 2007. By voiding the old regulations, the bill eliminates rules that were adopted under a prior governing structure and aligns the code with the current statutory framework for administering land development and disposal in the area. The bill takes effect upon passage and approval.
Impact
The bill affects Nevada administrative law by invalidating a specific set of regulations in the Nevada Administrative Code and requiring their removal from the code. It does not appear to create new land-use standards or transfer authority again; rather, it clears out obsolete regulations related to Fort Mohave Valley land development and disposal, affecting the legal status of NAC 321.100-321.230 and the agencies or local officials that rely on the updated code.
Sentiment
The available voting history suggests broad bipartisan support and little controversy. The bill passed the Assembly 35-7 and the Senate 21-0, indicating strong overall approval and a consensus that the regulations should be removed. No committee transcript is available, but the vote margins suggest the measure was viewed as a routine technical or housekeeping change rather than a major policy dispute.
Contention
The main point of potential contention is the decision to void regulations that previously governed land development and disposal in the Fort Mohave Valley, which could matter to local land administration and any parties affected by those rules. However, the legislative history provided does not show organized opposition or detailed debate, and the overwhelming Senate vote indicates that any concerns were limited. The bill appears to have been treated primarily as an update to reflect the earlier transfer of authority to Clark County.
Grants security officers serving at the village of Ardsley village court peace officer status; provides that such officers shall complete training if they are not otherwise police officers or peace officers.
Grants security officers serving at the village of Ardsley village court peace officer status; provides that such officers shall complete training if they are not otherwise police officers or peace officers.
Removing the expiration on certain cybersecurity requirements, modifying the duties of chief information security officers and cybersecurity programs, requiring assessment of executive branch agency compliance with cybersecurity requirements, providing for consideration of such compliance by the legislature during the budget process and creating the judicial branch technology oversight council.
Authorizing the chief information security officer to receive audit reports and updating statutes related to services provided by the chief information technology officer.
Relating to the employment of honorably retired peace officers as school district security personnel and the applicability to those officers of certain law governing private security.