New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill SCR46

Introduced
1/9/24  

Caption

Proposes constitutional amendment to increase mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 72.

Impact

The amendment seeks to amend Article VI, Section VI, paragraph 3 of the New Jersey Constitution, changing the age at which justices and judges are required to retire. Currently, the law necessitates the retirement of these judicial officials at age 70. The proposed change would evolve this age limit to 72, allowing judges to serve an additional two years while ensuring that they maintain 'good behavior' in office. This legislative change could significantly influence judicial appointments and the overall composition of the court, as it may extend the tenure of certain justices who may otherwise be replaced due to their age.

Process

If SCR46 is agreed upon, the revised constitutional amendment will be presented to the voters in a general election, with the ballot allowing citizens to express their approval or disapproval of the change. An interpretive statement will accompany the ballot question, explaining the implications of the amendment, ensuring the public is adequately informed before making their decision.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 46 (SCR46) proposes an amendment to the New Jersey Constitution aimed at increasing the mandatory retirement age for Justices of the Supreme Court and Judges of the Superior Court from 70 to 72 years. This proposal stems from a desire to allow experienced justices and judges to serve longer on the bench. Supporters argue that extending the retirement age will capitalize on the wealth of experience that older judges bring to their rulings, potentially enhancing the quality of justice delivered in the state.

Contention

While the bill has its advocates, there are notable concerns surrounding this proposed amendment. Critics may argue that prolonged tenures can hinder the infusion of new perspectives and diversity within the judiciary. The potential risks of aging judges delaying judicial turnover may lead to diminished opportunities for younger, potentially more diverse candidates to ascend to judicial positions. Additionally, there may be apprehensions regarding maintaining the health and competency standards of judges as they approach and surpass the traditionally accepted retirement age.

Companion Bills

NJ ACR120

Carry Over Proposes constitutional amendment to increase mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 72.

Previously Filed As

NJ SCR55

Proposes constitutional amendment to increase mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 72.

NJ S2290

Increases statutory mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court Justices, Superior Court Judges, Tax Court Judges, Administrative Law Judges, Workers' Compensation Judges and county prosecutors from 70 to 72.

NJ SB2152

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

NJ HB1528

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

NJ SB175

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

NJ SB175

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

NJ S3342

Increases statutory mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court Justices, Superior Court Judges, Tax Court Judges, Administrative Law Judges, and Workers' Compensation Judges from 70 to 75.

NJ SCR56

Proposes amendment to Constitution permitting justices and judges to engage in extra-judicial activities for compensation as permitted by court rule.

NJ SCR1040

justices; judges; mandatory retirement age

NJ CACR9

relating to the retirement age for judges. Providing that the mandatory judicial retirement age shall be increased from 70 to 75.

Similar Bills

LA HB472

(Constitutional Amendment) Revises Article VII of the Constitution of La. (OR -$139,000,000 GF RV See Note)

NJ ACR123

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR75

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

LA HB244

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB678

(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB473

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.