New Jersey Senate Bill S4798

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/6/25
• Refer: 11/6/25
• Report Pass: 12/1/25

Caption

Prohibits sale, manufacture, and distribution of certain apparel containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Impact

Once enacted, S4798 will alter state law with a clear mandate against PFAS in apparel. It classifies violations of the law as unlawful practices under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, which provides for significant penalties, including monetary fines of up to $10,000 for first offenses and $20,000 for subsequent breaches. Furthermore, violators may face cease and desist orders from the Attorney General and could be subject to punitive damages, thus employing a robust mechanism for enforcement. This change signifies a significant step towards reducing PFAS-related pollutants in consumer products, aligning with broader public health initiatives focused on environmental safety.

Summary

Senate Bill S4798, introduced by Senator Linda R. Greenstein, seeks to prohibit the sale, manufacture, and distribution of certain apparel containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) within the State of New Jersey. This bill aims to enhance consumer safety and health by limiting exposure to these harmful chemicals known for their adverse environmental and health effects. The legislation is explicit in its definition of 'apparel,' which encompasses a wide range of clothing items intended for various uses, including everyday wear, formal occasions, and outdoor activities. The bill establishes a timeline for enforcement, specifying a two-year period after its effective date for full compliance from manufacturers and retailers.

Contention

The introduction of Bill S4798 is expected to spark discussions among stakeholders, particularly manufacturers, retailers, and environmental advocates. Points of contention may arise over the economic impact on apparel production and sales, as manufacturers may argue that the transition away from PFAS could have cost implications. There could also be debates over the timing for compliance and the adequacy of alternatives to PFAS in the production of apparel. Proponents of the bill are likely to emphasize public health benefits, while opponents may raise concerns regarding potential job loss within the apparel industry and the feasibility of rapid compliance with the regulatory changes.