Makes $100 million in federal funds available to DEP for grants to local governments for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure projects.
Impact
The implementation of S2455 would significantly impact how agencies manage existing regulations. Currently, while many rules automatically expire after seven years, this bill introduces a formal review mechanism that requires agencies to justify the continued existence of such rules. Consequently, this could lead to either the amendment or repeal of regulations deemed ineffective or unnecessary. Such changes may foster a more conducive regulatory environment, encouraging efficiency within state governance. In addition, the required public notice and transparency about the review process aim to enhance public trust in the administrative framework.
Summary
Senate Bill S2455 introduces a framework that mandates state agencies to conduct periodic reviews of administrative rules and regulations every seven years. This review aims to ascertain if these rules continue to serve their intended purpose by weighing their benefits against any costs and burdens associated with them. The bill proposes a systematic approach for agencies to assess whether rules are still effective, have become outdated, or whether alternative provisions may better fulfill their objectives. The findings of these evaluations would then need to be reported to both the Governor and the Legislature, ensuring transparency in the regulatory process.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding S2455 appears supportive among proponents advocating for more efficient governance and reduced bureaucratic hurdles. They argue that the bill could streamline regulatory processes and improve governmental accountability. Conversely, some critics express concern that frequent reviews might lead to the destabilization of beneficial regulations and that the process could become overly politicized. The balance between regulatory efficiency and maintaining necessary protections is a topic of ongoing discussion.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding S2455 include the potential implications for rule-making authority and the capacity of agencies to effectively conduct thorough reviews. Critics have expressed fear that the mandatory nature of reviews could diminish agencies' ability to respond quickly to emerging issues or adapt to changing circumstances. Moreover, there are concerns that the review process could impose additional administrative burdens on agencies, possibly diverting resources from other critical functions.
Same As
Makes $100 million in federal funds available to DEP for grants to local governments for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure projects.
Carry Over
Makes $100 million in federal funds available to DEP for grants to local governments for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure projects.
Carry Over
Requires psychological examination when parent loses custody of child and wants to regain custody of child who is in care or custody of grandparent.
Makes $100 million in federal funds available to DEP for grants to local governments for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure projects.
Makes $100 million in federal funds available to DEP for grants to local governments for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure projects.
Makes $1.3 billion in federal funds available to DEP for use in New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Financing Program for lead service line replacement projects.