New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A386

Introduced
1/9/24  

Caption

Provides parties offering public remarks before Senate committees concerning qualifications of Superior Court judge nominees, upon motion, change of venue on family actions, to vicinage other than vicinage where nominee is assigned if confirmed.

Impact

If enacted, A386 would amend current procedures relating to family court actions linked to judicial nominations, allowing for greater protection of litigants' rights and ensuring impartiality in ongoing cases. By permitting a change of venue, the bill seeks to address potential biases that may arise when a nominee's character comes into question during public discussions. Thus, it promotes a more equitable judicial environment during the review of nominee qualifications, reflecting a commitment to upholding the integrity of the family court system.

Summary

Assembly Bill A386 aims to enhance public participation in the Senate's review process of gubernatorial nominees to the Superior Court by allowing parties involved in family law actions to request a change of venue. Specifically, when a party presents oral remarks concerning the qualifications or character of a judicial nominee during Senate committee meetings, they will have the ability to motion for their ongoing family proceedings to be moved to a different vicinage. This mechanism aims to ensure fair treatment in family law cases, particularly if the nominee has been publicly criticized by any involved parties.

Contention

The bill may provoke discussion regarding its implications for the judicial nomination process, as it could be perceived by some as facilitating a potentially disruptive influence on family law cases associated with openly contested judicial nominees. Critics may argue that this change could lead to an increased burden on the courts to accommodate venue changes, and they could express concerns regarding its potential to complication judicial efficiency and family law proceedings. Nonetheless, supporters would likely argue that it is a necessary safeguard to protect the interests of fair treatment in judicial proceedings.

Companion Bills

NJ A1394

Carry Over Provides parties offering public remarks before Senate committees concerning qualifications of Superior Court judge nominees, upon motion, change of venue on family actions, to vicinage other than vicinage where nominee is assigned if confirmed.

Previously Filed As

NJ A508

Provides parties offering public remarks before Senate committees concerning qualifications of Superior Court judge nominees, upon motion, change of venue on family actions, to vicinage other than vicinage where nominee is assigned if confirmed.

IN SB0019

Election of Lake County superior court judges.

IN SB0017

Election of Lake County superior court judges.

CT SJ00027

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Courtney M. Chaplin Of Hartford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HB05344

An Act Concerning Superior Court Venue For Election Cases.

CT HJ00068

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Nisa J. Khan, Esquire, Of West Hartford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT SJ00031

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Tejas Bhatt Of Windsor To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT SJ00051

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Yonatan E. Zamir, Esquire, Of Woodbridge To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT SJ00050

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Kevin C. Shea, Esquire, Of Madison To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT SJ00049

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Kevin C. Kelly, Esquire, Of Stratford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Similar Bills

IN HB1144

Courts.

CA AB1363

Protective orders: Wyland’s Law.

CA AB1724

Court operations.

WA SB5868

Adding an additional superior court judge in Skagit county and in Yakima county.

GA HB1215

Middle Judicial Circuit; superior courts; provide for a third judge

WA HB1621

Authorizing superior courts to appoint housing court commissioners.