Urges federal government to preserve school discipline guidance package issued in 2014.
Impact
The resolution emphasizes the importance of positive behavioral interventions such as conflict resolution and counseling, which are crucial to managing student discipline effectively. It highlights the detrimental impact of exclusionary measures like suspensions and expulsions, particularly noting their disproportionate effect on students from marginalized communities. By encouraging schools to develop policies that support constructive discipline approaches, the resolution aligns with broader legislative goals of promoting equity in educational experiences.
Summary
Senate Resolution No. 59 urges the federal government to preserve the school discipline guidance package issued in 2014 by the United States Departments of Education and Justice. This guidance package seeks to improve school climate and discipline practices while ensuring that these practices are effective and nondiscriminatory. The resolution reflects a commitment to maintaining supportive educational environments and the overall welfare of students by advocating against exclusionary practices that remove students from regular academic instruction.
Contention
Notably, the resolution cites concerns regarding potential revisions or rescissions of the 2014 guidance by the current federal administration. This point of contention, reflected in advocacy from various states' Attorneys General, underscores a collective commitment to uphold standards designed to prevent discrimination in school discipline practices. The resolution's support for the continuation of the guidance serves as a legislative effort to protect students' rights within educational settings.
Urges federal government to establish WIC waiver program allowing states to authorize use of WIC benefits to purchase alternative infant formulas during public emergencies.
A resolution to urge the federal government to issue clarifying rules or guidance explaining that claims applicable to state surprise billing laws must go through the state dispute resolution process, rather than the federal independent dispute resolution process.