New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill S3558

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Report Pass
3/13/23  
Engrossed
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
4/3/23  

Caption

Permits receipt of retirement annuities by certain members of JRS who filed for deferred retirement.

Impact

The enactment of S3558 will directly impact the financial landscape for former JRS members who have deferred their retirement and continue to serve in public roles. This legislative change aims to provide a safety net for judicial professionals, acknowledging their service while allowing them to access previously halted benefits. As such, it reinforces the importance of retaining experienced individuals in judicial positions, who may otherwise be deterred by the loss of retirement benefits if they chose to work again in these roles.

Summary

Senate Bill S3558 allows certain former members of the Judicial Retirement System (JRS) who filed for deferred retirement to reactivate their annuities received from State-administered retirement accounts. The bill applies specifically to individuals who deferred retirement between November 1, 2020, and the effective date of the legislation, and whose annuities were halted when they commenced service as a county prosecutor or the Administrative Director of the Courts. By permitting these members to reactivate their annuities, the bill offers a measure of financial support to those who return to public service in these judicial roles.

Sentiment

The sentiments expressed in the discussions around S3558 appear largely positive, with support from various stakeholders who see the value in reactivating annuities for those serving in essential judicial capacities. This bill is viewed as a recognition of the contributions made by judicial professionals and an incentive for them to continue their service. The clear unanimous vote (32-0) indicates a high level of agreement among lawmakers regarding the necessity and benefits of such measures.

Contention

Notable points of contention that arose during discussions included concerns about the potential implications for funding and the sustainability of the retirement system. While the bill was broadly supported, there were debates about ensuring the financial integrity of public retirement programs and whether reactivating annuities would set a precedent for other public service workers. Nevertheless, proponents emphasized the need for flexibility as essential to attracting and retaining experienced individuals in critical judicial roles.

Companion Bills

NJ A5264

Same As Permits receipt of retirement annuities by certain members of JRS who filed for deferred retirement.

Previously Filed As

MN SF1937

Augmentation of deferred annuities restoral for members who left public employment before January 1, 2019

NJ S1019

Permits retired judges to practice law while receiving pension or retirement allowance.

SC S0857

Contingent Deferred Annuities

SC H5094

Contingent Deferred Annuities

NH HB637

Relative to the reduction in the calculation of state retirement annuities at age 65 for certain group I retirement system members.

IL SB2872

CONTINGENT DEFERRED ANNUITIES

NJ A884

Reinstates automatic COLA for retirement benefits of certain members of TPAF.

DC B26-0100

Deferred Retirement Option Program Amendment Act of 2025

KS HB2540

Exempting contingent deferred annuities from certain requirements of the standard nonforfeiture law for individual deferred annuities act and authorizing the commissioner of insurance to establish nonforfeiture benefits for such contingent deferred annuities through rules and regulations.

NJ S3329

Excludes certain contributions to deferred compensation plans and provides deduction for certain individual retirement savings under the gross income tax.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.