New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill AR107

Introduced
3/7/22  

Caption

Urges New Jersey Supreme Court to study reasonableness of lowering court fees in civil asset forfeiture cases.

Impact

The proposed study could lead to significant policy changes regarding civil asset forfeiture practices in New Jersey. If the court fees are deemed excessively high and, if lowered, this may enhance the ability of individuals to reclaim their property, thus reinforcing citizens' property rights. Additionally, this resolution seeks to promote uniform practices across counties, addressing discrepancies that currently exist in filing costs and procedures, particularly noted in Hudson County, where multiple claims can be consolidated, escalating fees for claimants.

Summary

Assembly Resolution No. 107 urges the New Jersey Supreme Court to evaluate the reasonableness of court fees associated with civil asset forfeiture cases. The resolution highlights the financial barriers claimants face when attempting to reclaim their seized property, often leading to cases where the costs of filing exceed the value of the forfeited assets. This situation raises concerns regarding access to justice for individuals who are not charged with crimes but whose property has been taken by law enforcement under the preponderance of evidence standard, which is significantly lower than the criminal conviction standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Contention

Debate surrounding civil asset forfeiture often centers on the implications it has for civil liberties and law enforcement practices. Critics argue that such measures can incentivize police departments to prioritize property seizures as a revenue source, possibly leading to abuse of power. Notably, data indicating higher forfeiture rates in minority populations have sparked calls for reforms. This resolution aligns with those reformative goals by advocating for both a reassessment of financial barriers and a potential shift in how civil asset forfeiture is implemented within the legal framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NJ SR80

Urges New Jersey Supreme Court to study reasonableness of lowering court fees in civil asset forfeiture cases.

NJ AR124

Urges New Jersey Supreme Court to refer to supervisory treatment program as "Recovery Court" in publications.

NJ AR102

Urges State Supreme Court to amend Court Rules to increase transparency in consumer debt litigation filings and procedures.

NJ AR118

Urges Supreme Court to establish payment kiosks for court-ordered obligations.

NJ S0726

Civil Asset Forfeiture

NJ A2177

Requires New Jersey Supreme Court to issue order dismissing certain charges, complaints, and arrest warrants filed with or issued by municipal courts and unresolved for five years or more; requires AOC to conduct certain studies.

NJ S3996

Requires New Jersey Supreme Court to issue order dismissing certain charges, complaints, and arrest warrants filed with or issued by municipal courts and unresolved for five years or more; requires AOC to conduct certain studies.

NJ HB914

Relating to repealing civil asset forfeiture provisions and establishing criminal asset forfeiture in this state.

NJ H1953

Relative to civil asset forfeiture

NJ ACR51

Urges parties to 1954 U.S. Supreme Court Decree to address ongoing risk of Delaware River Basin flooding.

Similar Bills

HI SB722

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

HI HB126

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

WV HB2772

Relating generally to forfeiture of contraband

WV HB5261

Relating generally to forfeiture of contraband

CO HB1250

Procedures Related to Civil Asset Forfeiture

CO HB261250

Concerning procedures relating to state action resulting in the relinquishment of private property, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation.

AZ HB2324

Forfeiture; digital assets; reserve fund

HI SB320

Relating To Property Forfeiture.