New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

New Hampshire Senate Bill SB473

Filed/Introduced
 
Introduced
11/21/25  
Refer
11/21/25  
Report Pass
1/9/26  
Engrossed
2/26/26  
Refer
2/26/26  

Caption

defining the term "field officers" within the national guard.

Summary

SB 473 makes a narrow definitional change to New Hampshire law governing the Army National Guard. It amends RSA 110-B:20 to specify that, for purposes of promotion and appointment, the terms “field grade officers” and “field officers” mean officers holding the rank of lieutenant colonel or colonel. The bill does not create a new program or alter broader National Guard structure; instead, it clarifies which ranks are included in an existing category used in personnel actions. By codifying the definition in statute, the bill is intended to remove ambiguity in how promotion and appointment rules are applied to these higher-ranking officers.

Impact

The bill amends RSA 110-B:20 by adding a new paragraph defining “field grade officers” or “field officers” for Army National Guard promotion and appointment purposes. Its practical effect is to standardize interpretation of the term in state law, limiting it to lieutenant colonels and colonels. The bill affects National Guard personnel administration and any state processes that rely on this classification, but it does not appear to change eligibility standards beyond the definitional clarification.

Sentiment

The available record suggests broad, noncontroversial support for the bill. There are no recorded committee transcripts or vote details indicating opposition, and the measure appears to have moved as a technical clarification rather than a policy dispute. The overall tone is consistent with a housekeeping amendment aimed at aligning statutory language with existing military rank usage.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the available materials. Because the bill is narrowly focused on defining a term used in promotion and appointment of Army National Guard officers, any disagreement would likely have centered on whether the statutory definition was necessary or whether it might affect personnel interpretation, but no such objections are recorded. The absence of transcripts and votes suggests the measure was not politically divisive.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NH HB589

Defining and prohibiting wanton animal waste and prohibiting certain wildlife hunting contests.

NH SB150

Defining electric vehicle charging station and charging a fee for annual testing by the division of weights and measures.

NH HB122

Relative to payment of claims arising out of actions or activities of the New Hampshire national guard.

NH HB104

Relative to requiring an official declaration of war for the activation of the New Hampshire national guard in a foreign state.

NH HB129

Relative to the definition of the term "evidence-based" within public education.

NH HB467

Defining "social districts" and enabling municipalities to create social districts.

NH HB123

Defining pre-sequestration timber tax revenue, establishing a moratorium on carbon sequestration and establishing a commission to study the effects of carbon sequestration in New Hampshire forests upon state and local tax revenue, effective forest management, and the health of New Hampshires logging industry.

NH HB74

Defining the term citizen for the purposes of the right to know law and including preliminary drafts circulated to a quorum of a majority of a public body as disclosable documents.

NH HB239

Defining and enabling lane filtering.

NH SB127

Relative to public guardianship and the office of the public guardian and making appropriations to the department of health and human services.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.