making an appropriation to the department of environmental services for wastewater infrastructure projects.
Summary
HB 97 makes two nonlapsing general fund appropriations of $15 million each, one for fiscal year 2026 and one for fiscal year 2027, to the Department of Environmental Services. The money is designated for wastewater projects approved under RSA 486 on or before June 30, 2026, which means the funds would support eligible wastewater infrastructure projects already within the state aid grant framework.
The bill is primarily a capital funding measure rather than a policy overhaul. It does not create new positions or change the underlying wastewater program structure, but it does authorize the governor to draw the appropriated sums from the treasury and makes the funds nonlapsing, allowing them to remain available for the intended projects beyond the fiscal year in which they are appropriated. The fiscal note indicates that the state’s expenditures would increase by an indeterminable amount over time as grant payments are made, while local governments could see corresponding increases in revenue and expenditures tied to project implementation and repayment schedules.
Impact
HB 97 would amend state spending law by adding $30 million in total general fund appropriations over two fiscal years for wastewater infrastructure. It would directly affect the Department of Environmental Services and municipalities or other eligible project sponsors seeking state aid under RSA 486, while leaving the underlying statutory criteria for wastewater project approval unchanged. Because the appropriations are nonlapsing and the grant payments may extend over 20 years or more, the bill would create a long-term fiscal commitment for the state and potential long-term financing benefits for local wastewater systems.
Sentiment
The available voting history suggests the bill was controversial and did not command broad consensus. The recorded vote shows an ITL outcome with 175 yeas and 155 nays, indicating a divided chamber and a relatively close margin. With no committee transcript provided, the discussion record is limited, but the vote pattern implies that supporters viewed the bill as an important infrastructure investment, while opponents were likely concerned about the size of the general fund commitment and the long-term budget implications.
Contention
The main point of contention appears to be fiscal: whether the state should commit $30 million in general fund money to wastewater infrastructure at a time when the expenditures would be spread over many years. Supporters likely emphasized the need for environmental and municipal infrastructure investment, while opponents likely focused on the cost, the nonlapsing nature of the appropriation, and the open-ended future state aid obligations tied to project repayment schedules and interest rates. The close ITL vote indicates that both the infrastructure benefits and the budgetary risks were significant issues for legislators.
Making appropriations to the department of health and human services to support community and transitional housing through community mental health centers.
Establishing the "partners in housing" program, an initiative under the housing champions fund to assist municipalities, counties, and developers in building workforce housing, and making an appropriation therefor.
(New Title) establishing the "partners in housing" program, an initiative under the housing champions fund to assist municipalities, counties, and developers in building workforce housing, and making an appropriation therefor.
Establishing the housing champion business loan program and making appropriations to the department of business and economic affairs and the business finance authority.