prohibiting the acquisition of prescriptive rights in private roads through adverse use.
Impact
If enacted, HB 1135 would significantly clarify and strengthen the rights of landowners in New Hampshire regarding their private roads and pathways. It would eliminate the possibility of individuals gaining legal rights to use someone's property based on continuous use over time, thereby ensuring that property rights are upheld and preventing potential disputes about access and ownership rights. Additionally, this act includes a provision that it does not retroactively affect claims that were already fully adjudicated before the law's effective date.
Summary
House Bill 1135 is legislation aimed at prohibiting the acquisition of prescriptive rights in private roads, driveways, paths, and trails through adverse use. The bill stipulates that the use of a landowner's property by any individual or the public will not confer any legal rights or easements through adverse possession, regardless of how long such usage has occurred. This legislation responds to concerns over the informal establishment of rights through historical usage patterns and seeks to reaffirm the controlling interests of private property owners.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 1135 appears to be largely supportive among property owners and those concerned with defining and protecting property rights. Proponents of the bill argue that it establishes clear boundaries for property usage, which is critical in preventing confusion and legal challenges arising from adverse use claims. However, there may be concerns among advocates for public access and community rights, as the bill could limit the public's ability to access certain frequently used private paths or trails, potentially leading to opposition from those groups.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between private property rights and public access. Critics of the bill might argue that it could lead to the restriction of community access to trails that have been traditionally used by the public. Furthermore, as there is a growing emphasis on preserving access to natural spaces and promoting outdoor activities, some community members may feel the bill's provisions could undermine those values and limit recreational opportunities.
Prohibiting network exclusion for pharmacies that refuse to dispense a prescription of the PBM reimbursement that is below the pharmacy's acquisition cost.
Prohibiting the division of motor vehicles from suspending a license on the basis of debt owed to a private entity related to the towing or storing of a motor vehicle.